2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in quality of life outcomes after paraclavicular decompression for thoracic outlet syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mental stress is very rarely mentioned in the TOS literature, however. We found only one mention concerning NTOS: "Patients with NTOS reported significantly lower aggregate mental health QoL than patients with vascular-only TOS" (Al Rstum et al 2020). Similarly, TOSI question 12, on difficulty in working overall, correlates quite poorly with CBSQ and QDASH; CBSQ does not measure work capacity at all, and QDASH measures it by one question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Mental stress is very rarely mentioned in the TOS literature, however. We found only one mention concerning NTOS: "Patients with NTOS reported significantly lower aggregate mental health QoL than patients with vascular-only TOS" (Al Rstum et al 2020). Similarly, TOSI question 12, on difficulty in working overall, correlates quite poorly with CBSQ and QDASH; CBSQ does not measure work capacity at all, and QDASH measures it by one question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2008;33:1518-1524. nTOS reported significantly lower mental health Quality of Life scores than patients with vTOS preoperatively and throughout follow-up. 54 As surgical approaches for the management of TOS involve decompression surrounding delicate, important neurovascular structures, complications can be severe and even life-threatening. Injury to the subclavian vein or artery, brachial plexus, thoracic duct and long thoracic, intercostobrachial, recurrent laryngeal, and phrenic nerves have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derkash's classification is a region-specific tool, as it assesses perceived disability in patients with arm, shoulder, and hand problems. These assessment schemes can well reflect the function of the upper limb and are used to categorize primary outcomes as “excellent” if there was no pain and a return to preoperative status, “good” if intermittent pain was well tolerated and there was the possibility of a return to the preoperative status, “fair” if intermittent or permanent pain was not well tolerated and a return to the preoperative status was difficult, or “poor” if symptoms had not improved or were aggravated ( 26 ). Peek et al ( 27 ) confirmed that Derkash's classification was an effective tool to evaluate the improvement of upper limb function because of its wide use in practice and the availability of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%