2009
DOI: 10.1185/03007990902875877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in psychometric properties, cut-off scores, and outcomes between the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in pharmacotherapy-based stroke trials: systematic literature review

Abstract: Despite the lack of uniformity in the cut-off points used in the trials, the follow-up time after administration of therapy, and the amount of time within which treatment is initiated after onset of stroke symptoms, the MRS seems to be more sensitive and responsive as compared to the BI in measuring stroke disability. However, more studies are required to differentiate the BI and the MRS that would help in selecting a scale that would appropriately capture outcomes among stroke patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The inter-rater reliability is sufficient at the item level. Its overall inter-rater agreement is good 17) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The inter-rater reliability is sufficient at the item level. Its overall inter-rater agreement is good 17) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The cutoff points of dependence in the activities of daily living scales were a Barthel Index (score of ≤60, modified Rankin Scale score of >2, and a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of ≤3. 25,26 However, in the Auer 1989 study, dependence was considered to be Grade 5 according to its own scale. 17 If there was more than one scale to evaluate the patients' functional outcome within one article, we first selected the Barthel Index as the assessment scale, then the modified Rankin Scale and Glasgow Outcome Scale.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, there is no standard approach, with good BI arbitrarily defined as total scores ranging from BI of 50 to 95, with the most prevalent cut-off point at BI Ͼ95. 47 It has been suggested that key scores are BI Ͻ40 (representing complete dependence on others), BI Ͼ60 (transition from complete dependence to assisted independence), and BI Ͼ85 (representing independence with minor assistance as could be reasonably provided in a community setting). 38 Some may consider poorest outcome after stroke to be death; unlike mRS, the BI does not have a separate score to represent mortality.…”
Section: Interpreting Bi Data For Stroke Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%