Introduction. This study measured knee frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) and sports safety and performance perceptions of female athletes during a single leg forward hop down and stabilization (SLFHS) for 3 conditions (standard knee sleeve, no device and distal thigh compression garment (DTCG)). The hypothesis was that the DTCG group would display superior dynamic knee valgus FPPA compared to the standard knee sleeve and no device groups. Methods. Eighteen healthy college athletes participated in this prospective cohort study with a randomized device order. FPPA was measured during SLFHS using two-dimensional biomechanical techniques to estimate dynamic knee valgus loading. A 10-cm visual analog scale survey collected data regarding subject perceived knee control, sports movement capability and overall satisfaction for each condition. Pearson correlations delineated knee valgus, safety and performance relationship perceptions (p < 0.05). Results. Mean/maximum dynamic knee valgus FPPA was lowest during the DTCG condition (8.7 ± 6°/12.2 ± 7°), or a 19.4%/21.3% range of motion reduction compared to the standard knee sleeve (10.8 ± 7°/15.5 ± 8°) and a 21.6%/17% reduction compared to the no device (11.1 ± 7°/14.7 ± 7°) conditions. Chi-square tests revealed that the T:25 group displayed a greater proportion of subjects with a "1" score (≤threshold value) than the standard knee brace or no device groups for both mean (one-sided p value = 0.02) and maximal (one-side p value = 0.049 FPPA). In relationship to maximum dynamic knee valgus FPPA, the DTCG was the best overall condition (r = 0.61, p = 0.007), relating more strongly to perceived knee control (r = 0.63, p = 0.005) and sports movement capability (r = 0.64, p = 0.004). Conclusions. Compared to standard knee sleeve and no knee device conditions, the T:25 device provided better dynamic knee valgus FPPA control and stronger subject perceptions of best overall condition, knee control and sports movement capability.