2005
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.26.2.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Primary Mental Abilities Between Musicians and Nonmusicians

Abstract: Abstract. In the present study, psychometric performance on different aspects of primary mental abilities (verbal comprehension, word fluency, space, flexibility of closure, perceptual speed, reasoning, number, and memory) was compared in 70 adult musicians and 70 nonmusicians matched for age, sex, and level of education. No significant differences could be confirmed for either mean full-scale scores or for specific aspects of mental abilities, except Flexibility of Closure and Perceptual Speed. In both these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(144 reference statements)
5
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As these two variables had different rating scales, we first standardized (i.e., z-scored) them and then computed their average to create the Actual ability. We focus on assessing "actual real-life musical achievement" (Kemp, 1996, p. 31) by examining overall actual ability that is meaningful for distinguishing musicians from one another, rather than assessing more specific abilities such as pitch discrimination or chord analysis (e.g., Drake, 1954) and broad abilities such as actual performance (see Helmbold, Rammsayer, & Altenmüller, 2005 for a review) that typically compare musicians and nonmusicians. Whereas our perceived ability measure uses participants' self-ratings by definition,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these two variables had different rating scales, we first standardized (i.e., z-scored) them and then computed their average to create the Actual ability. We focus on assessing "actual real-life musical achievement" (Kemp, 1996, p. 31) by examining overall actual ability that is meaningful for distinguishing musicians from one another, rather than assessing more specific abilities such as pitch discrimination or chord analysis (e.g., Drake, 1954) and broad abilities such as actual performance (see Helmbold, Rammsayer, & Altenmüller, 2005 for a review) that typically compare musicians and nonmusicians. Whereas our perceived ability measure uses participants' self-ratings by definition,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duration of music lessons predicts cognitive abilities -including language -among children and adults (Schellenberg, 2006). In contrast, comparisons of musicians and nonmusicians yield null or inconsistent results (e.g., Helmbold, Rammsayer, & Altenmüller, 2005). Similarly problematic is the failure to account for musical training when studying aptitude (e.g., Slevc & Miyake, 2006), because musical training improves performance on tests of musical aptitude.…”
Section: Domain-transfer Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age average was 22±1.5 (range: 22-29), academic education time average was 15±1.5 (range: [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Dominant hand was right hand in all participants and none had mental illness in their family history.Two participants had DEHB diagnosis in childhood but they had no medication stories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Improvements in visual short term memory tests were witnessed in children aged between 5 and 6 who take piano training for a year, performance increase was seen in delayed visual recollection and recognition in the adults averagely aged 22.6 and took music training. 21,22 In a prospective fMRI study, it was suggested that temporary auditory novelties during music training increase processing in hippocampus and hippocampal effects result from music training. 23 A study didn't find significant differences in auditory number distance test as our study, but it linked abilities in cognitive processing of musicians to auditory skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%