2020
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1842426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in physical activity and perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + college students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the high proportion of individuals meeting the aerobic portion without meeting the RT portion may be partially explained by the fact that over 50% of the participants in this study identified as women. Even with this caveat, our findings are consistent with previous research regarding lower levels of PA among LGBTQ+ students and individuals compared with their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts (3,8–11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the high proportion of individuals meeting the aerobic portion without meeting the RT portion may be partially explained by the fact that over 50% of the participants in this study identified as women. Even with this caveat, our findings are consistent with previous research regarding lower levels of PA among LGBTQ+ students and individuals compared with their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts (3,8–11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One factor contributing to PA behavior among members of the LGBTQ+ community is perception of the benefits and barriers associated with engagement in PA (16,17). Our research indicates that perceptions of PA are associated with PA behavior, and LGBTQ+ students perceive fewer benefits and more barriers to engaging in PA than their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts (9). Moreover, in addition to general barriers to PA (e.g., lack of time, motivation), individuals identifying as LGBTQ+ may perceive unique benefits and barriers that are not adequately captured using standard quantitative measures such as the Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale (EBBS), thus precluding the elucidation of factors contributing to suboptimal PA participation (15,17–22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations