2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4559-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Phenotypes and Liver Transplantation Outcomes by Age Group in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Abstract: Background There is increasing evidence for a heterogeneity of phenotypes in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), but differences across the age spectrum in adults with PSC have not been well characterized. Aims To characterize phenotypic variations and liver transplantation outcomes by age group in adults with PSC. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify waitlist registrations for primary liver transplantation in adults with PSC. Patients were split into three age group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Black patients in our cohort were younger at diagnosis than their White counterparts. Our finding is supported by the limited literature published in this arena which also demonstrates that Black patients present earlier than White patients 10,11,27,28 . In our cohort, there was also a trend towards female predominance among Black patients with PSC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Black patients in our cohort were younger at diagnosis than their White counterparts. Our finding is supported by the limited literature published in this arena which also demonstrates that Black patients present earlier than White patients 10,11,27,28 . In our cohort, there was also a trend towards female predominance among Black patients with PSC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our finding is supported by the limited literature published in this arena which also demonstrates that Black patients present earlier than White patients. 10,11,27,28 In our cohort, there was also a trend towards female predominance among Black patients with PSC. This observation is consistent with earlier reports which showed a higher female prevalence in Black patients with PSC compared to published data in White patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…13,14 Prior studies demonstrated that African Americans with PSC were younger at the time of listing and presented with more severe disease as manifested by phenotypic characteristics and biological MELD score; all factors have been associated with worse outcomes among patients with PSC. 12,15 In addition to ethnicity-specific differences in disease presentation, response to post-LT immunosuppressive therapies has also been hypothesized to partly contribute to the lower survival seen in African Americans after LT. In a single-center study by Nagashima et al 16 , among recipients undergoing transplantation on tacrolimus-based regimens, a reduced immunosuppressive effect was observed in African Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites, which may contribute to higher rates of acute and chronic rejection in African American recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most patients had private/commercial insurance. The median MELD score at the time of LT listing was 15 (Interquartile range (IQR) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. At the time of LT waitlist registration, half of patients did not have any evidence of ascites and 66% did not have any evidence of hepatic encephalopathy (Table 1).…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Study Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in at least some PSC patients, even with a complicating cholangiocarcinoma, LT may be feasible [2]. In the accompanying article [3], the authors identified 8272 adults with PSC without a diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma listed for LT using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database over the period [2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013][2014][2015]. Dividing the patients into three age groups, 18-39, 40-59, and [60 years, they explored age-related differences in presentation, waiting list status, and post-LT outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%