2021
DOI: 10.31341/jios.45.2.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology Among University Students and Teachers

Abstract: Two online surveys among 1105 university students and 656 employees were conducted with the inclusion of the construct Personal Innovativeness in the domain of Information Technologies (PIIT). After calculating descriptive statistics, statistically significant differences between personal innovativeness of university students and teachers were sought by the application of one-way ANOVA. The first and most important finding was that average perceived PIIT of teachers and students falls around the middle of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the differences that require attention include their differential training needs (PSTs need better coordination of materials, whereas ISTs welcomed more training and need to be rewarded for their time); their modeling source (PSTs found a model in their peers, whereas the training instructor was the ISTs' model); and their feedback sources (PSTs needed feedback from an authority figure, whereas ISTs relied on their pupil's feedback). Previous studies have documented some of the differences between PSTs' and ISTs' concerning the ML adoption process (Mac Callum et al, 2014), as well as differences between university teachers and students regarding the use of online learning in general (Dolenc et al, 2021;Šorgo et al, 2021). However, the current study further demonstrates Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the differences that require attention include their differential training needs (PSTs need better coordination of materials, whereas ISTs welcomed more training and need to be rewarded for their time); their modeling source (PSTs found a model in their peers, whereas the training instructor was the ISTs' model); and their feedback sources (PSTs needed feedback from an authority figure, whereas ISTs relied on their pupil's feedback). Previous studies have documented some of the differences between PSTs' and ISTs' concerning the ML adoption process (Mac Callum et al, 2014), as well as differences between university teachers and students regarding the use of online learning in general (Dolenc et al, 2021;Šorgo et al, 2021). However, the current study further demonstrates Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…The comparison between PSTs' and ISTs' perceptions regarding ML adoption is especially important, given that previous studies have demonstrated that teachers and students are influenced by different factors when adopting technology (Mac Callum et al, 2014). More recently, a few studies have argued that conducting a comparative analysis of the views of teachers vs. students engaged in adopting innovative technology is imperative (Dolenc et al, 2021;Kovacs et al, 2021;Šorgo et al, 2021). Thus, for example, a study that examined educators' and students' views regarding the online education imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic found that while some views were shared by the two groups, in other respects, they differed substantially, thus underscoring the need to explore both perspectives to fully understand the issue.…”
Section: Rogers' Diffusion Of Innovation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%