2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in perception and reaction of tourist groups to beach marine debris that can influence a loss of tourism revenue in coastal areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
98
0
13

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
98
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Litter on a beach is a big turn off for locals and visitors alike. At Ponel de Parana, Brazil, beach litter items amounting to 15 items/m 2 can cause an economic loss ranging from US$ 3.2 to 8.5 million, resulting in a forfeiture of tourist income of between 15% to 39% [86]. The cost of Ponel de Parana beach cleaning (mostly state funded) would represent just 6.2% of potential economic losses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter on a beach is a big turn off for locals and visitors alike. At Ponel de Parana, Brazil, beach litter items amounting to 15 items/m 2 can cause an economic loss ranging from US$ 3.2 to 8.5 million, resulting in a forfeiture of tourist income of between 15% to 39% [86]. The cost of Ponel de Parana beach cleaning (mostly state funded) would represent just 6.2% of potential economic losses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it began as a series of educational and land-management principles released by the US Forest Service, US Bureau of Land Management, and US National Park Service in the 1960s to encourage outdoorsmen to leave the environment as undisturbed as possible (Marion & Reid 2001), Leave No Trace has encouraged a significant increase in protected area visitation, regardless of visitor duration in the area (Taff et al 2014). This increased visitation at cleaner beaches can increase tourism revenue by millions of dollars, offsetting potential increases in municipal costs for waste removal (de Araújo & Costa 2006, McIlgorm et al 2011, Jang et al 2014, Williams et al 2016, Krelling et al 2017. Education about the impacts of human use on sensitive areas can encourage compliance with Leave No Trace principles and reduce human−ecosystem conflicts, including outside of the Leave No Trace area, such as minimized disturbance to wildlife and coastal ecosystems, reduced littering or equipment abandonment resulting in marine debris, and increased participation in environmental cleanups (Zeppel 2008, Lawhon et al 2013, Beeharry et al 2017, Mascovich 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…threatened species conservation, increased tourism revenue, improved beach aesthetics) may increase adoption of positive environmental behaviors (Ockwell et al 2009, Kamrowski et al 2014, Fuentes et al 2016. With time and compliance, fewer enforcement patrols will be needed, limiting the potential deterrent effect of nighttime human activity on sea turtle nesting, reducing coastal zone management costs, and increasing tourism revenue through cleaner beaches (Jacobson & Figueroa Lopez 1994, Ballance et al 2000, de Araújo & Costa 2006, Jang et al 2014, Krelling et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, after a heavy rainfall event which resulted in a significant increase in coastal debris loads in South Korea, revenue losses from tourism were estimated at $29-37M USD (Jang et al, 2014). In coastal California, visitors are reported to travel longer distances to avoid beaches with more waste (Leggett et al, 2014), and in Brazil, a recent survey reports that 85% of beachgoers will avoid beaches with high litter loads (>15 pieces per m 2 ) (Krelling et al, 2017). This is also interesting in light of numerous reports (and anecdotal evidence) that beachgoers themselves can be a contributing source of debris (Santos et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%