2019
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1684806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in open innovation practices between headquarters and subsidiaries in the automotive industry: The French case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the barriers identified as impeding the adoption of OI are the apprehension that external ideas and technologies do not fit the company’s needs, the difficulty of accepting and integrating ideas from outside and the existence of cultural and organizational barriers (Ili et al , 2010). In addition, a lack of clarity exists regarding OI strategy and fear of losing control of projects, theft or appropriation of intellectual property and knowledge (Martins and Kaminski, 2019). Furthermore, no channels exist that allow all external agents, particularly small ones, to understand the sector’s requirements and needs.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the barriers identified as impeding the adoption of OI are the apprehension that external ideas and technologies do not fit the company’s needs, the difficulty of accepting and integrating ideas from outside and the existence of cultural and organizational barriers (Ili et al , 2010). In addition, a lack of clarity exists regarding OI strategy and fear of losing control of projects, theft or appropriation of intellectual property and knowledge (Martins and Kaminski, 2019). Furthermore, no channels exist that allow all external agents, particularly small ones, to understand the sector’s requirements and needs.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation in the automotive field combines several scientific disciplines to shape a final product, many of which are specific and have costs that are difficult to assume. In this regard, open practices can be useful for improving the product development process and changing the way companies are currently creating new products and technologies (Martins and Kaminski, 2019). In relation to the above, incoming practices based on the acquisition of R&D services, the application of collective intelligence, co-creation with partners and the acquisition of patents are predominant in the industry.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brazilian case is interesting not only because the country invests a higher percentage of its GDP in R&D than its neighboring countries, but also because the most important innovation strategy in Brazilian firms is technology acquisition (Jugend et al, 2018), which furthers its importance as a locus of research. Other researches have also addressed the subject of open innovation in the Brazilian automotive industry (Balcet & Consoni, 2007;Gondim, Borini, & Carneiro-Da-Cunha, 2017;Ibusuki, Bernardes, & Consoni, 2015;Martins & Kaminski, 2019).…”
Section: Relevance Of Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%