2008
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Lower Extremity Anatomical and Postural Characteristics in Males and Females Between Maturation Groups

Abstract: Descriptive, cross-sectional.We compared lower extremity anatomical characteristics in males and females between different maturation groups.Sex differences have been observed in lower extremity anatomical characteristics. While the reasons contributing to these sex differences in adults are unknown, there is evidence that anatomy and posture change considerably during growth and development.One hundred seventy-three young athletes (age range, 9-18 years) were assessed for stage of maturation and placed into 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
68
4
Order By: Relevance
“…All alignment characteristics were measured using identical techniques that have been previously described in detail 25,2830 . Q angle was measured in the standardized stance using a goniometer and represented the angle formed by a line from the anterior superior iliac spine to the patella center and a line from the patella center to the tibial tuberosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All alignment characteristics were measured using identical techniques that have been previously described in detail 25,2830 . Q angle was measured in the standardized stance using a goniometer and represented the angle formed by a line from the anterior superior iliac spine to the patella center and a line from the patella center to the tibial tuberosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater levels of joint laxity are risk factors for noncontact ACL injuries (29) and are associated with excessive frontal and rotational plane motion. These motions increase ACL loading (18) and are associated with high risk movements such as dynamic knee valgus (26). Following injury, loss of lean mass may be limited to the involved limb thereby creating an asymmetry in force production capacity and subsequent performance during a vertical jump (9, 28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, during the loading phase of level walking, ACL-de fi cient subjects have signi fi cantly decreased external knee fl exion moments and increased external knee extension moments compared to uninjured control subjects (Fig. The quadriceps avoidance gait pattern has been identi fi ed in ACL-de fi cient knees in several investigations including 16 of 32 (50 %) knees (that also had varus malalignment) in the authors' laboratory [ 123 ] , 7 of 8 subjects >7 years post-injury in an investigation by Wexler et al [ 161 ] , and 12 of 16 (75 %) subjects in a study by Berchuck et al [ 20 ] . The quadriceps avoidance gait pattern has been identi fi ed in ACL-de fi cient knees in several investigations including 16 of 32 (50 %) knees (that also had varus malalignment) in the authors' laboratory [ 123 ] , 7 of 8 subjects >7 years post-injury in an investigation by Wexler et al [ 161 ] , and 12 of 16 (75 %) subjects in a study by Berchuck et al [ 20 ] .…”
Section: Gait Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 82%