2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in knee joint kinematics and forces after posterior cruciate retaining and stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, it is recognised that the PS prosthesis and procedure will result in a different knee condition, including postoperative kinematics and outcomes, compared with CR [22][23][24][25]. In our study, joint-component gap at flexion was significantly larger than at extension in PS using the measured-resection technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Traditionally, it is recognised that the PS prosthesis and procedure will result in a different knee condition, including postoperative kinematics and outcomes, compared with CR [22][23][24][25]. In our study, joint-component gap at flexion was significantly larger than at extension in PS using the measured-resection technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Numerous studies have reported on the kinematics, clinical efficacy and life‐span of CR TKA and posterior stabilized TKA. Each type of prosthesis has advantages and disadvantages. The aim of TKA is to reconstruct the mechanical axis of the knee via bone resection and/or soft tissue balance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knee kinematics after TKA revealed a variety of movement patterns, including almost physiological sequences but also paradoxical forward slide of the femoral condyles during flexion [3,13,22]. Regardless of cruciate-retaining or cruciate-substituting implants, normal knee kinematics are rarely observed [13,31]. Intra-operative knee kinematics can be influenced by implant design and surgical technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%