2008
DOI: 10.1291/hypres.31.1357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Insulin Action and Secretion, Plasma Lipids and Blood Pressure Levels between Impaired Fasting Glucose and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Japanese Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, besides alleviation of glucose and / or lipotoxicity toxicity, VG could directly improve hepatic insulin resistance and augment the benefi cial eff ects of NAT on postprandial dysmetabolism in our insulin-resistant animal models. Consistent with the fi ndings that hepatic insulin resistance is the major determining factor on fasting plasma glucose levels [22] , fasting plasma glucose in the combination group is lower compared to the monotherapies, but there is no significant diff erence between them. High data variability of fasting plasma glucose levels may aff ect the statistical signifi cance.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, besides alleviation of glucose and / or lipotoxicity toxicity, VG could directly improve hepatic insulin resistance and augment the benefi cial eff ects of NAT on postprandial dysmetabolism in our insulin-resistant animal models. Consistent with the fi ndings that hepatic insulin resistance is the major determining factor on fasting plasma glucose levels [22] , fasting plasma glucose in the combination group is lower compared to the monotherapies, but there is no significant diff erence between them. High data variability of fasting plasma glucose levels may aff ect the statistical signifi cance.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Another study reported that isolated IGT was characterized by both impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance, but there are no significant differences in insulin sensitivity between isolated IFG and isolated IGT ( n = 128, n = 55, resp.) subjects [ 24 ]. In the present study, we have elucidated the significant difference between isolated IGT and isolated IFG with large number of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure of the disposition index was reduced in iIFG (mean ± SEM, 7.1 ± 0.5; P < 0.05; with iIFG defined as fasting plasma glucose 6.1–7.0 mmol/L) compared with the NGT group (9.7 ± 0.2). A more extreme and statistically significant difference was detected in the iIGT (mean ± SEM, 2.7 ± 0.2) and the combined IFG plus IGT (2.1 ± 0.2) groups compared with both the NGT and iIFG groups ( P < 0.05) (33). In another study of 1,272 Chinese adults, a decline in early phase DI o (ΔAUC PI /ΔAUC PG at 30 min, adjusted with the Matsuda Index) was found in both iIFG (fasting glucose 5.6–7.0 mmol/L) and iIGT—both significantly lower than NGT—but DI o in iIGT also was significantly lower than DI o in IFG (both P < 0.05) (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%