2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in growth and areal production between Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) regeneration material representing different levels of genetic improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the trials were established with a single tree plot so as to evaluate more families. In the further study, multiple trees of a family will be arranged in each plot to reduce the environmental effect and improve the estimation of heritability and realized genetic gains, and these selected families and new families from the natural populations of the desired provenances will be involved in the progeny trials [37,38]. More superior families and individuals in families will thus be screened out for plantation forestry of B. alnoides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the trials were established with a single tree plot so as to evaluate more families. In the further study, multiple trees of a family will be arranged in each plot to reduce the environmental effect and improve the estimation of heritability and realized genetic gains, and these selected families and new families from the natural populations of the desired provenances will be involved in the progeny trials [37,38]. More superior families and individuals in families will thus be screened out for plantation forestry of B. alnoides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to δ 13 C, no significant direct response to selection for height growth was observed. This result was unexpected, as height growth in pine trees is known to be heritable (Kroon et al, 2011), and there is ample evidence of direct responses to selection for growth in forest trees (Liziniewicz and Berlin, 2019). In particular, results from breeding programs designed to improve tree growth and timber quality have documented large direct responses to selection for growth in many conifer species (Jansson, 2007; Burdon et al, 2008; Haapanen et al, 2016), including Aleppo pine (Matziris, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection experiments with forest trees empirically testing direct response to selection for traits other than growth and wood quality are rare (MacLachlan et al, 2017; Liziniewicz and Berlin, 2019). In particular, we are not aware of selection experiments reporting correlated responses in functional traits related to tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in response to selection for water‐use efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be able to meet the demand for improved material nonnative seeds are usually imported from other countries (Myking et al 2016). In case this is not possible trees with lower performance have to be used which in turn yields lower growth and quality (Liziniewicz and Berlin 2019;Haapanen, 2020). The nonnative seeds can also be a potential source of nonnative pests, which needs to be considered when importing material from other countries (Franić et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%