2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in gene expression dependent on sampling site in placental tissue of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is growing evidence that a dysregulation of spiral artery invasion by EVT in the first trimester is a process contributing to the vascular resistance observed in the pregnancy complications preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in late pregnancy [21,22]. In line with this finding, we and others have previously shown that placental CRH expression and CRH in maternal plasma are significantly elevated in IUGR [23-26]. IUGR is further pathophysiologically characterized by a reduction in trophoblastic syncytialisation rate [27], increased leptin [28] and reduced 11β-HSD2 [29] expression.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…There is growing evidence that a dysregulation of spiral artery invasion by EVT in the first trimester is a process contributing to the vascular resistance observed in the pregnancy complications preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in late pregnancy [21,22]. In line with this finding, we and others have previously shown that placental CRH expression and CRH in maternal plasma are significantly elevated in IUGR [23-26]. IUGR is further pathophysiologically characterized by a reduction in trophoblastic syncytialisation rate [27], increased leptin [28] and reduced 11β-HSD2 [29] expression.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Previous studies have documented that genes involved in hypoxia or metabolism-related genes are common to the group of differentially expressed genes in the FGR placenta [31-34]. However, these findings may require careful interpretation, since the expression of these genes is often affected by sampling site bias [35,36]. In addition, although the question of whether pre-eclampsia and FGR share a common etiology is not a long-standing issue, there have been few comparative expression profiles undertaken for these disorders, and the results are not consistent [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the differences in the examined population due to the large heterogeneity and the diversity of the underlying causes of FGR [2] as well as the variety in the gestational age of maternal sampling or placental biopsies. In particular, Tzschoppe et al (2010) showed that differences in the sampling site may contribute to variability in gene expression across the placental disk in placentas from FGR-affected pregnancies. Since these placentas represent diseased tissue and show characteristic hypoxic/ischemic changes, it may result in more dramatic changes in gene expression levels [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Tzschoppe et al (2010) showed that differences in the sampling site may contribute to variability in gene expression across the placental disk in placentas from FGR-affected pregnancies. Since these placentas represent diseased tissue and show characteristic hypoxic/ischemic changes, it may result in more dramatic changes in gene expression levels [42]. Secondly, posttranscriptional and/or posttranslational modifications may affect the measured levels of the hormones/proteins in the circulation, not always corresponding to the placental expression [37,43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%