2002
DOI: 10.20659/jjfp.36.1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in forest landscape image between photographs and actual field landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While research objectives have expanded in relation to outdoor recreation (Oku and Fukamachi 2006), restorative values (Takayama et al 2014;Song et al 2017), and cultural ecosystem services (Kovács et al 2020), most studies have used plantation forests as study sites (e.g. Ichihara et al 1990;Park and Kobayashi 1993;Shirafuji et al 2002). Only a few studies have been carried out in evergreen broad-leaved forests (Hori 1987;Igawahara and Kagawa 1999;Takayama et al 2009), and all of these used the SD method (factor analysis with varimax rotation).…”
Section: Review Of Forest Landscape Assessment Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While research objectives have expanded in relation to outdoor recreation (Oku and Fukamachi 2006), restorative values (Takayama et al 2014;Song et al 2017), and cultural ecosystem services (Kovács et al 2020), most studies have used plantation forests as study sites (e.g. Ichihara et al 1990;Park and Kobayashi 1993;Shirafuji et al 2002). Only a few studies have been carried out in evergreen broad-leaved forests (Hori 1987;Igawahara and Kagawa 1999;Takayama et al 2009), and all of these used the SD method (factor analysis with varimax rotation).…”
Section: Review Of Forest Landscape Assessment Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%