2010
DOI: 10.3758/app.72.6.1591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that both the error magnitude and the difference between top and bottom arithmetic scorers decreased with tone duration. Likely, the larger percent errors at smaller physical durations are due to a constant, duration-independent sensory error [41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Note that both the error magnitude and the difference between top and bottom arithmetic scorers decreased with tone duration. Likely, the larger percent errors at smaller physical durations are due to a constant, duration-independent sensory error [41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Experimental evidence suggests that performance in duration discrimination is affected by stimulus type. It was found that filled auditory intervals (continuous tones) were discriminated more accurately than empty intervals (with onset and offset marked by clicks) at a 50-ms base duration (Rammsayer, 2010;Rammsayer, & Lima, 1991). No such performance differences could be shown for longer intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Temporal sensitivity, as reflected by performance on duration discrimination, appears to be based on, at least partially, different mechanisms than perceived duration (Grondin, & Rammsayer, 2003;Rammsayer, 2010). In contrast to the large number of studies on modality-specific effects on perceived duration, systematic investigations of the effects of sensory modality on performance on duration discrimination are extremely scant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, some psychophysical evidence suggests it may be (e.g. Horr & Di Luca, 2015;Rammsayer, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%