1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf00399406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in DNA composition along mammalian metaphase chromosomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A modification of the procedure, termed T -banding, stains only telomeres (122). Subsequent studies demonstrated that staining the treated chromosomes with acridine orange resulted in excellent R banding (26, [123][124][125][126][127][128][129]. When photographed in color the R-bands were green, the remaining portions of the chromosome were orange or red.…”
Section: R-banding Detection Of Gc-rich Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modification of the procedure, termed T -banding, stains only telomeres (122). Subsequent studies demonstrated that staining the treated chromosomes with acridine orange resulted in excellent R banding (26, [123][124][125][126][127][128][129]. When photographed in color the R-bands were green, the remaining portions of the chromosome were orange or red.…”
Section: R-banding Detection Of Gc-rich Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of mouse and human chromosomes by the C-banding technique, CHEN and RUDDLE (1971) showed that metacentric mouse chromosomes contained about twice the normal amount of centric hvterochromatin. This has been confirmed by the use of a new fluorescent compound (HILWIG ahd GROPP 1972) and by acridine orange staining after denaturation-reassociation (DE LA CHAPELLE et al 1973). Furthermore, on mouse chromosomes there are several instances of heterochromatin displaced from the centromere but staining deeply by the C-banding technique and annealing with mouse satellite DNA (CHEN and RUDDLE 1971), and also staining brightly with the compound detected by HILWG and GROPP (1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This assumption is supported by observations of the quenching of HO fluorescence of BrdUrd substituted DNA of whole cells (2,21) and of chromosomes isolated from cells treated with BrdUrd (7). It should be noted, however, that the effect of BrdUrd substitution on energy transfer from HO to CA3 (19) and the nonrandom distribution of nucleotides in the various chromosomes (8,18,(22)(23)(24) have not been considered in these calculations. Using these simplifying assumptions we estimated the fraction of HO binding DNA synthesized during various periods of BrdUrd labeling (due to the HO binding specificity for runs of three adenine (A)/thymine (T) pairs, this relates to the amount of AT replicated).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%