1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)12249-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
246
0
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
246
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation was different in Japan: temporal trends in incidence by stage showed that the proportion of early tumors almost doubled between 1976-1980 and 1991-1995, whereas it did not vary in Slovenia or in the USA [11]. This difference could be partly explained by differences between pathologist point of view, as Japanese pathologists include among cancers certain lesions, for example, intramucosal carcinomas, that are classified as severe dysplasia in the Western world [12], and by the decreasing proportion over time of unstaged tumors. The increase in Japan could also partly be explained by the development of screening programs in this country [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The situation was different in Japan: temporal trends in incidence by stage showed that the proportion of early tumors almost doubled between 1976-1980 and 1991-1995, whereas it did not vary in Slovenia or in the USA [11]. This difference could be partly explained by differences between pathologist point of view, as Japanese pathologists include among cancers certain lesions, for example, intramucosal carcinomas, that are classified as severe dysplasia in the Western world [12], and by the decreasing proportion over time of unstaged tumors. The increase in Japan could also partly be explained by the development of screening programs in this country [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The histological criteria used to make the histological diagnosis of intramucosal cancer were based on Japanese histological criteria, 11 which differ from those accepted by Western pathologists who consider invasion into the lamina propria of the mucosa mandatory for the diagnosis of carcinoma, whereas the preferred criteria among Japanese pathologists are nuclear and structural abnormalities (atypia). 12 Well-differentiated and moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinomas and papillary adenocarcinomas corresponding to the intestinal-type (Lauren's classification 1 ) were used to analyze genetic alterations (defined as differentiated-type adenocarcinomas). However, poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas and signet ring cell carcinomas that were classified as diffuse type according to Laurens's classification 1 were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Patient Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, however, intramucosal tumors are classified together with localized cancers, even in the absence of invasion of the lamina propria. 21 This divergence produces a large discrepancy in prognosis (survival) and is reflected in the ratio of incident cases to cancer deaths. The recent Vienna consensus classification of digestive tumors may reduce this bias in the future.…”
Section: Stages Of Stomach Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in Japan, the proportion of the population examined in this organized program is not so large; in 1983 the coverage of the screening was 9.6% of the target On the other hand, the decline in the proportion of localized cancer in Slovenia during the period is largely attributable to the progression in staging procedures and the higher resectability rate in the country since 1982. 43 Among the cases detected in Japan at the stage of intramucosal neoplasia, many would be classified high-grade dysplasia in the Western world 21 and not recorded as "cancer." This is a major cause of the different prognosis of stomach cancer in Japan and in the West.…”
Section: Respective Roles Of Lifestyle and Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%