2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2988-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in conductive foot cooling: a comparison between males and females

Abstract: The feet of females cooled at a faster rate than those of males in response to the same conductive cooling stimulus to the soles of the feet. However, similar reductions in skin blood flow were found for the same change in toe skin temperature. Therefore, sex related differences may be due to the differing dimensions of the feet, but further research including males and females matched for foot dimensions are required to confirm this mechanism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In showing that thermosensitivity across hands and feet is similar between males and females when these are matched for body surface area, our study complements previous evidence showing that sex differences in thermophysiological responses of hands and feet are reduced when male and female groups are matched by body surface area (36,45).…”
Section: Males and Females Present Small Thermosensitivity Differencessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In showing that thermosensitivity across hands and feet is similar between males and females when these are matched for body surface area, our study complements previous evidence showing that sex differences in thermophysiological responses of hands and feet are reduced when male and female groups are matched by body surface area (36,45).…”
Section: Males and Females Present Small Thermosensitivity Differencessupporting
confidence: 86%
“… 44 However, hand volume provided an even stronger correlation with cooling rates, so anthropometric differences may predominate instead. 45 A similar finding was reported by Lunt and Tipton 46 with females exhibiting faster toe temperature cooling in response to conductive cooling of the soles of the feet; no intra-menstrual cycle differences were evident. Again, the generally larger male foot volume, along with a strong correlation between foot dimension and toe cooling rate, suggest a dominant anthropometric rather than sex effect.…”
Section: Population Studiessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…31,32 The influence of sex hormones and phases of the luteal cycle may have explained some of the variation between sexes in younger females although recent data suggest that there are no intramenstrual differences noted in response to cooling the feet. 33 However in our study, it was assumed that the majority of females were postmenopausal (average age of females was 61.4 years, range 34-87), thus hormonal influences were not likely to explain why females, particularly older females, reported improvements in QOL and a more pronounced reduction in negative symptoms, related to cooling. Behaviorally, this sex response in older females could be partially explained by females initiating a cognitive temperature regulation response earlier than males in order to maintain thermal balance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%