2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Chemical Doping Matter: Superconductivity in Ti1–xTaxSe2 but Not in Ti1–xNbxSe2

Abstract: We report that 1T-TiSe 2 , an archetypical layered transition metal dichalcogenide, becomes superconducting when Ta is substituted for Ti but not when Nb is substituted for Ti. This is unexpected because Nb and Ta should be chemically equivalent electron donors. Superconductivity emerges near x = 0.02 for Ti 1-x Ta x Se 2 , while for ARPES and Raman scattering studies show similarities and differences between the two systems, but the fundamental reasons why the Nb and Ta dopants yield such different behavior a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example Ti 1−x Ta x Se 2 shows metallic-like behavior with dρ/dT > 0 and a superconducting dome, but Ti 1−x Nb x Se 2 gives insulating-like dρ/dT < 0 all the way to room temperature [6,21], even though the Nb and Ta dopants are nominally isoelectronic. The details of how the dopant species interacts with the host matrix are thus highly relevant, as Nb dopants appear to cause substantially more disorder than Ta [21]. In other cases, such as lightlydoped Pd x TiSe 2 [27] and some of the pressure-grown TiSe 2 samples reported by Campbell et al [14], the resistivity shows similar behavior to the iodine vapor transport-grown samples, with a slope-change at T c and a broad peak, but then exhibits a steep upturn in resistivity below 80-100 K, while the Hall coefficient only saturates at a much lower temperature, and at a larger magnitude [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example Ti 1−x Ta x Se 2 shows metallic-like behavior with dρ/dT > 0 and a superconducting dome, but Ti 1−x Nb x Se 2 gives insulating-like dρ/dT < 0 all the way to room temperature [6,21], even though the Nb and Ta dopants are nominally isoelectronic. The details of how the dopant species interacts with the host matrix are thus highly relevant, as Nb dopants appear to cause substantially more disorder than Ta [21]. In other cases, such as lightlydoped Pd x TiSe 2 [27] and some of the pressure-grown TiSe 2 samples reported by Campbell et al [14], the resistivity shows similar behavior to the iodine vapor transport-grown samples, with a slope-change at T c and a broad peak, but then exhibits a steep upturn in resistivity below 80-100 K, while the Hall coefficient only saturates at a much lower temperature, and at a larger magnitude [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the comparison of such criteria may seem a little mundane, the reliable deter- mination of T c becomes crucial for the construction of phase diagrams based on tuning the properties of TiSe 2 . Superconductivity has been found in TiSe 2 close to the critical point for the suppression of long-range CDW order via pressure [26], charge carrier doping [22], or intercalation [20,21,27]. However, for a full understanding of the interplay of CDW and superconducting orders, it is important to be confident of the determination of the CDW phase boundary, which in some studies has been partially or solely delineated by the analysis of transport measurements.…”
Section: Criteria For the Determination Of Cdw Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMDs form a large family of materials that have been of significant interest in the past because they exhibit a variety of charge density wave phenomena (CDWs) at low temperatures [16][17][18]. Upon doping or the application of pressure, they give rise to a generic phase diagram that usually includes a superconducting state [19] (figure 1) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 T -TiSe makes a 2 2 2 CDW order below K and the superconductivity can be induced by suppressing CDW order through, e.g., electric field, doping or pressure [ 160 162 ]. Despite multiple ARPES studies and theoretical scenarios to explain the nature of the bulk CDW phase [ 161 166 ], the microscopic origin still remains elusive.…”
Section: Arpes Studies On Tmdcmentioning
confidence: 99%