2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Cervical Multifidus Muscle Thickness During Isometric Contraction of Shoulder Muscles: A Comparison Between Patients With Chronic Neck Pain and Healthy Controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(42 reference statements)
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the cervical muscles become active to stabilize the cervical spine against the imposed perturbation due to vertebral rotation. This finding is in agreement with the results of previous studies [16‐18]. Karimi et al [16] found deep dorsal neck muscles thickness changes during a maximal voluntary isometric task of the upper extremity, which showed the major role of the deep cervical muscles in providing the spine stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the cervical muscles become active to stabilize the cervical spine against the imposed perturbation due to vertebral rotation. This finding is in agreement with the results of previous studies [16‐18]. Karimi et al [16] found deep dorsal neck muscles thickness changes during a maximal voluntary isometric task of the upper extremity, which showed the major role of the deep cervical muscles in providing the spine stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The weakness of the dorsal neck muscles observed in patients with CNNP may adversely affect cervical stability when coping with the imposed perturbations of daily activities. Several studies have reported such deterioration in dorsal neck muscles function after chronic neck pain [16‐18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within cases mean difference in the bilateral semispinalis capitis thickness: painful side < asymptomatic side, p < 0.05. Yes ↑ mean difference in the bilateral semispinalis capitis thickness in cases ↓ mean difference in the bilateral semispinalis capitis thickness in painful side Neck pain Rahnama (2015) [ 52 ] Multifidus muscle thickness change w. shoulder MVC in 6 directions Multifidus muscle thickness: baseline: NS, cases vs. controls; During MVC: significant interaction of group x force, controls > cases ( p = 0.03). NS, cases vs. controls group x direction; 3- & 4-way interactions involving group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased muscle dimensions were observed in cases in the cervical multifidus during rest [ 47 ]. In Rahnama et al [ 52 ], no difference in multifidus muscle thickness was observed during baseline, but there was a smaller increase in cases than in controls in muscle thickness from baseline values during isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). An increased muscle shape ratio (ratio between lateral and anterior-posterior dimensions) was seen in the multifidus of cases [ 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation