2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-013-2983-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in cardiovascular risk factors and socioeconomic status do not explain the increased risk of death after a first stroke in diabetic patients: results from the Swedish Stroke Register

Abstract: Aims/hypothesis This study compared survival rates and causes of death after stroke in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in Sweden. We hypothesised that differences in cardiovascular risk factors, acute stroke management or socioeconomic status (SES) could explain the higher risk of death after stroke in diabetic patients. Methods The study included 155,806 first-ever stroke patients from the Swedish Stroke Register between 2001 and 2009. Individual patient information on SES was retrieved from Statistics Swe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a possible trend towards a modification of treatment of hypertension or diabetes along the last decade in this population can be, in all likelihood, ruled out, similarly to what has been observed in Italy . Effect of newly recommended therapies such as the recent introduction of thrombolysis is being, on the other hand, addressed to a very marginal percentage of cases, especially in diabetic patients . A further element to exclude the possibility of differences in treatment between diabetic and control patients is represented by the observation that length of hospital stay was reduced just about equally in the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a possible trend towards a modification of treatment of hypertension or diabetes along the last decade in this population can be, in all likelihood, ruled out, similarly to what has been observed in Italy . Effect of newly recommended therapies such as the recent introduction of thrombolysis is being, on the other hand, addressed to a very marginal percentage of cases, especially in diabetic patients . A further element to exclude the possibility of differences in treatment between diabetic and control patients is represented by the observation that length of hospital stay was reduced just about equally in the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DM is an important risk factor for ischemic stroke; the reported hazard ratio (HR) for ischemic stroke was 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-2.7) in individuals with DM versus those without DM. 1 Furthermore, ischemic stroke patients with DM have a poor prognosis, [2][3][4] and DM has been widely used to predict outcome after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack as an important risk factor. [5][6][7] The traditional glucose-based criteria of DM are based on a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L and/or 2-hour OGTT ≥11.1 mmol/L).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%