1983
DOI: 10.1016/0077-7579(83)90006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in bill form of the oystercatcher haematopus ostralegus; a dynamic adaptation to specific foraging techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
3

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
66
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They feed more often on open tidal flats than males which occur more often on musselbeds (Swennen et al 1983, Hulscher 1985. These differences in feeding habits, and consequently food types, could also explain the differences in the cadmium content of the sexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They feed more often on open tidal flats than males which occur more often on musselbeds (Swennen et al 1983, Hulscher 1985. These differences in feeding habits, and consequently food types, could also explain the differences in the cadmium content of the sexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the low density of Ensis, and its great burrowing capacity, some individual oystercatchers have already successfully specialized in catching them, which illustrates again the flexibility of the oystercatcher in changing its feeding habits (cf. Swennen et al, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low density and great depth explained the absence of Ensis in the core samples. The burrowing depth of Ensis is much deeper than the length of any oystercatcher's bill, which in the Wadden Sea population is less than 10 cm (Glutz von Blotzheim et al, 1975;Swennen et al, 1983).…”
Section: Observations On Predators Of Ensis Directusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the course of an organism's lifetime, mechanical wear on these resources must be minimized, while the net energy obtained from food, or in some cases invested in reproduction, is maximized. These physiological resources vary across organisms, including oystercatcher beaks [182], wasp ovipositors [79], the mandibles of plant-eating insects [158], and the molar enamel of mammals [177,114,167,143], including modern and extinct hominins [112,170,191].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%