2006
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Axis I and II Comorbidity Between Bipolar I and II Disorders and Major Depressive Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
64
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
64
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fan & Hassell developed the hypothesis that, due to the similarity of some symptoms, cluster B disorders are more commonly found in bipolar patients than clusters A and C. 11 Regardless of the instruments used and the symptomatic state in which patients are evaluated, cluster B disorders remain those most frequently reported. 22,27,33,34 In our review, 87 patients (23%) belonged to this cluster, confirming the existing literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fan & Hassell developed the hypothesis that, due to the similarity of some symptoms, cluster B disorders are more commonly found in bipolar patients than clusters A and C. 11 Regardless of the instruments used and the symptomatic state in which patients are evaluated, cluster B disorders remain those most frequently reported. 22,27,33,34 In our review, 87 patients (23%) belonged to this cluster, confirming the existing literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Further examination of these articles was performed and yielded a final sample of three eligible articles. The remaining nine articles were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria: four studies mixed inpatients and outpatients 10,[26][27][28] ; two included only hospitalized patients 20,22 ; and the remaining three included outpatients, but not all were in euthymia. [29][30][31] Most of the studies used diagnostic scales other than HAM-D and YMRS, and some used none at all (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies measuring affective instability using the ALS have suggested both bipolar disorder II and borderline personality disorder involve similar levels of affective lability, though there are differential patterns in the two disorders (Henry et al, 2001;Reich et al, 2012). Whilst we did not have a borderline personality disorder comparison group our results may in part be explained by comorbidity with borderline personality disorder, which is known to exist in 25-30% of people with bipolar disorders being highest in bipolar II (Mantere et al, 2006). These results may help to explain the difficulties that clinicians have in delineating bipolar disorder II and borderline personality disorder.…”
Section: Theoretical and Clinical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Es posible que en esta muestra exista un sobrediagnóstico de TB por haber diagnosticado como tales a pacientes que presentan cambios del estado anímico propias de su TUS o TP, e igualmente puede existir un sobrediagnóstico de TP en esta muestra por el instrumento utilizado, de cualquier forma el hecho de realizarse una entrevista estructurada puede minimizar ese sesgo e, igualmente, se ha referido que reconociendo la dificultad diagnóstica que conlleva estos cuadros y la necesidad de la realización de un adecuado diagnóstico diferencial entre las manifestaciones afectivas y conductuales de los TB, TP y TUS, la comorbilidad entre estos cuadros es habitual con otros TP u otros trastornos del eje I como los trastornos de ansiedad (Bauer et al, 2005;Merikangas et al, 2007;Mantere et al, 2006;Merikangas et al, 2011;Mazza et al, 2009). Así la comorbilidad del TB con TP como puede ser el trastorno límite se asocia con un mayor riesgo de TUS (Hidalgo-Mazzei, Walsh, Rosenstein y Zimmerman, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified