Differences in attentional bias to smoking-related, affective, and sensation-seeking cues between smokers and non-smokers: an eye-tracking study

Rahmani, Noreen; Chung, Jonathan; Eizenman, Moshe; Jiang, Pingping; Zhang, Helena; Selby, Peter; Zawertailo, Laurie

doi:10.1007/s00213-022-06245-y

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, a large-scale study of multi-cues is required to assess the impacts of the three cue types included here in various combinations. Future research, possibly that using eye-tracking methods, which has been performed in several cue-related studies [ 44 , 45 ], might investigate where the subject’s attention is drawn when multi-cues are presented.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smokers’ Self-Report and Behavioral Reactivity to Combined Personal Smoking Cues (Proximal + Environment + People): A Pilot Study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cue reactivity (CR) among smokers exposed to smoking-related stimuli, both proximal (e.g., cigarettes, lighter) and distal (environments, people), has been well-demonstrated. Furthermore, past work has shown that combining proximal smoking cues with smoking environment cues increases cue-provoked craving and smoking behavior above that elicited by either cue type alone. In this pilot study, we examined the impact of combining three personal cues, proximal + environment + people, on subjective and behavioral cue reactivity among smokers. To further understand the impact of this method, we also tested reactivity under the conditions of both smoking satiety and deprivation. In addition, we examined the extent to which cue-induced craving predicted immediate subsequent smoking. Fifteen smokers completed six sessions, of which two focused on the intake and development of personal cues and four involved personal cue reactivity sessions: (1) deprived, smoking cue combination, (2) deprived, nonsmoking cue combination, (3) sated, smoking combination, and (4) sated, nonsmoking cue combination. Cue-provoked craving was greater and smokers were quicker to light a cigarette and smoked more during their exposure to smoking rather than nonsmoking cues and in deprived compared to sated conditions, with no interaction between these variables. While deprived, greater cue-provoked craving in response to smoking cues was correlated with a quicker latency to light a cigarette. This work supports the feasibility of presenting three personal smoking-related combinations of cues within a cue reactivity paradigm and highlights the robust reactivity that this methodology can evoke in smokers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smokers’ Self-Report and Behavioral Reactivity to Combined Personal Smoking Cues (Proximal + Environment + People): A Pilot Study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Multiple studies have demonstrated that eye tracking can reliably measure AB toward drug-related stimuli, as measured by the differential amount of time spent viewing drug-related versus other (e.g., neutral) stimulus types. For example, studies have found that smokers exhibited eye gaze preference for smoking-related cues compared with nonsmokers (Kwak et al, 2007; Mogg et al, 2003; Rahmani et al, 2022). Other works suggest that this gaze preference for smoking-related cues is positively associated with craving to smoke (Kang et al, 2012; Mogg et al, 2003) and nicotine deprivation (Field et al, 2004).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Using eye tracking to evaluate the impact of smartphone-delivered attentional bias modification training for smokers.

Robinson,

Cui,

Engelmann

et al. 2024

Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Attentional Bias Toward Cigarette-Related Cues in Male Smokers is Modulated by Cognitive Control Mechanisms

Zhang,

Chen

2024

Substance Use & Misuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Differences in attentional bias to smoking-related, affective, and sensation-seeking cues between smokers and non-smokers: an eye-tracking study

Cited by 3 publications

References 71 publications

Smokers’ Self-Report and Behavioral Reactivity to Combined Personal Smoking Cues (Proximal + Environment + People): A Pilot Study

Smokers’ Self-Report and Behavioral Reactivity to Combined Personal Smoking Cues (Proximal + Environment + People): A Pilot Study

Using eye tracking to evaluate the impact of smartphone-delivered attentional bias modification training for smokers.

Attentional Bias Toward Cigarette-Related Cues in Male Smokers is Modulated by Cognitive Control Mechanisms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About