2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in AMY1 Gene Copy Numbers Derived from Blood, Buccal Cells and Saliva Using Quantitative and Droplet Digital PCR Methods: Flagging the Pitfall

Abstract: IntroductionThe human salivary (AMY1) gene, encoding salivary α-amylase, has variable copy number variants (CNVs) in the human genome. We aimed to determine if real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and the more recently available Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) can provide a precise quantification of the AMY1 gene copy number in blood, buccal cells and saliva samples derived from the same individual.MethodsSeven participants were recruited and DNA was extracted from the blood, buccal cells and sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, several studies using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) have reported similar results to our study, whereby AMY1 was associated with BMI [16] and fat mass [16]. Moreover, the results of both ddPCR and qPCR methods were shown to be equivalent when performed on blood samples [8,28]. Hence, we expect that any variations in sensitivity in the present study would be minimal, since qPCR was performed on PBMC samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nevertheless, several studies using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) have reported similar results to our study, whereby AMY1 was associated with BMI [16] and fat mass [16]. Moreover, the results of both ddPCR and qPCR methods were shown to be equivalent when performed on blood samples [8,28]. Hence, we expect that any variations in sensitivity in the present study would be minimal, since qPCR was performed on PBMC samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Several studies have investigated the relationship between AMY1 gene CN and predisposition to metabolic disorders, including obesity, T2D and insulin resistance, in both children and adults. However, contradicting results were reported 7,[12][13][14][15]18,19,[21][22][23][24][25][32][33][34] .The reported discrepancies remain unexplained, and possible reasons include the different techniques used to estimate the AMY1 gene CN 35 as well as the different ethnicities 21,36 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ and age 37 of the populations studied. The distribution of AMY1 gene CN in our study sample (2-20 copies) is comparable to what was reported previously across modern human populations 38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We calculated areas under the blood glucose based on the trapezoid rule. AMY1 expression was assessed by Droplet Digital PCR, which is preferred for its precise measurement [5,17]. Briefly, TaqMan Copy Number Assays for AMY1A (AMY1A:Hs07226362_cn) and restriction enzyme DraI (Anza 77 DraI; both from Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of these studies are conflicting, because some studies have shown no association of AMY1 CNV with obesity and impaired glucose metabolism [11][12][13][14][15][16]. These conflicting results may be due to the heterogeneity in patient samples in terms of racial and genetic background, various complications and acquired physical conditions, and the use of different study methods particularly for the assessment of AMY1 CNV [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%