2014
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2015663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Alarm Events Between Disposable and Reusable Electrocardiography Lead Wires

Abstract: A closed-book, multiple-choice examination following this article tests your under standing of the following objectives:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 8 intervention studies, 7 included adult patients, and 1 included pediatric patients . All were single‐hospital studies; 6 were quasi‐experimental and 2 were experimental .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 8 intervention studies, 7 included adult patients, and 1 included pediatric patients . All were single‐hospital studies; 6 were quasi‐experimental and 2 were experimental .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 8 intervention studies, 7 included adult patients, and 1 included pediatric patients . All were single‐hospital studies; 6 were quasi‐experimental and 2 were experimental . Settings included progressive care units (n = 3), CCUs (n = 3), wards (n = 2), PACU (n = 1), and a step‐down unit (n = 1) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a 2015 study, Albert et al 13 examined the differences in alarm events between disposable and reusable ECG lead wires. This randomized controlled trial (RCT), which involved 1611 patients, asked 2 questions: First, is one type of ECG lead wire noninferior (eg, disposable leads are noninferior [not much worse] than the reusable leads), and if the disposable leads are noninferior, are they superior?…”
Section: Alarm Safety and Alarm Fatiguementioning
confidence: 99%