2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Accuracy and Radiation Dose in Placement of Iliosacral Screws: Comparison between 3D and 2D Fluoroscopy

Abstract: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a widely accepted method of stabilizing the posterior pelvic ring. Recently developed tools such as 3D-navigated fluoroscopy and computed navigation seem to prevent a surgeon from conducting screw misplacement. The study aimed to comparatively assess the introduction of sacroiliac screw placement using 2D and 3D fluoroscopy in terms of accuracy and radiation exposure. Iliosacral screws were introduced in 37 patients using 2D (group N1) and in 36 patients using 3D fluor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24][25][26] However, the superiority of advanced imaging techniques over simple fluoroscopy with regard to the risks of neurovascular injury and implant malposition has not been clearly established. [22][23][24][25]27 The majority of pelvic fracture surgeons continue to use simple fluoroscopy, the most affordable and available imaging modality, for percutaneous pelvis fixation. 26,[28][29][30] Patient factors influence the quality and feasibility of fluoroscopic imaging in pelvis surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25][26] However, the superiority of advanced imaging techniques over simple fluoroscopy with regard to the risks of neurovascular injury and implant malposition has not been clearly established. [22][23][24][25]27 The majority of pelvic fracture surgeons continue to use simple fluoroscopy, the most affordable and available imaging modality, for percutaneous pelvis fixation. 26,[28][29][30] Patient factors influence the quality and feasibility of fluoroscopic imaging in pelvis surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several decades, numerous researchers have depended on high-quality imaging apparatus, including computer navigation, O-arm navigation, and surgical robotics, in order to acquire precise intraoperative images [22][23][24]. This has resulted in enhanced screw insertion safety and accuracy[8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the occurrence of iatrogenic injury, many methods have recently been introduced to assist the insertion of sacroiliac screws. Using 3D-based fluoroscopy for the navigation of sacroiliac screws is not advantageous, compared with traditional 2D fluoroscopy 20 . Robot-assisted techniques, such as TiRobot and Artis Zeego, can effectively reduce the operation time and fluoroscopy times, and ensure the safety of the operation, helping the surgeon to quickly master sacroiliac screws surgery 21 , 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%