2015
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in 23S ribosomal RNA mutations between wild-type and mutant macrolide-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis isolates

Abstract: Abstract. The aim of the present study was to determine the in vitro susceptibility of wild-type and mutant clinical isolates of Chlamydia (C.) trachomatis strains to erythromycin, azithromycin and josamycin, and to identify the resistance-conferring 23S ribosomal (r)RNA mutations in the isolates. The wild-type resistant isolates were defined as those with minimum inhibitory concentration values above the tissue concentration of the antibiotic in the urogenital system. Furthermore, all resistant C. trachomatis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many bacterial species are becoming fully resistant to all frontline drugs, including sexually transmitted bacteria such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium, which commonly coinfect with C. trachomatis (Unemo and Shafer 2011). Despite treatment failures of C. trachomatis infections with recommended therapeutic antimicrobials being reported (Hogan et al 2004), isolated reports of genomically conferred resistance (Misyurina et al 2004;Jiang et al 2015), and the ease with which resistance can be selected for in vitro by exposure to subinhibitory antimicrobial concentrations (Sandoz and Rockey 2010), little is known about the prevalence, if any, of circulating resistance traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many bacterial species are becoming fully resistant to all frontline drugs, including sexually transmitted bacteria such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium, which commonly coinfect with C. trachomatis (Unemo and Shafer 2011). Despite treatment failures of C. trachomatis infections with recommended therapeutic antimicrobials being reported (Hogan et al 2004), isolated reports of genomically conferred resistance (Misyurina et al 2004;Jiang et al 2015), and the ease with which resistance can be selected for in vitro by exposure to subinhibitory antimicrobial concentrations (Sandoz and Rockey 2010), little is known about the prevalence, if any, of circulating resistance traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible mechanisms underlying drug resistance should be investigated in the future in order to understand the resistance of isolates exhibiting no mutation in the peptidyl transferase region of the 23S rRNA gene. The merits of the Chinese study are that, for the first time, wild-type macrolide-resistant C. trachomatis strains have been observed in vitro, and for the first time, A2057G and A2059G mutations in the peptidyl transferase region of the 23S rRNA gene have been found in C. trachomatis with selective macrolide resistance [13].…”
Section: Determining the Antibiotics Resistance Of Pathogen Std Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotypes were determined by comparison of resulting sequences with reference C. trachomatis omp1 sequences in the GenBank database. Conclusions were that the mechanism responsible for heterotypic resistance in C. trachomatis remains unknown, being possible that the observed multidrug resistance to be phenotypic rather than genotypic in nature since the molecular targets of azithromycin, doxycycline and ofloxacin are quite different, and it is highly unlikely that a single or a limited number of gene mutation(s) could be responsible for simultaneous resistance to these diverse agents [13,48].…”
Section: Determining the Antibiotics Resistance Of Pathogen Std Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations