2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between target and non-target probe processing — Combined evidence from fMRI, EEG and fMRI-constrained source analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the task was not exactly the same as that utilized by Lamp et al ( 2016 ), both research groups have suggested that the left fusiform gyrus is involved in categorical representation and verbal rehearsal. On the other hand, Galashan et al ( 2015 ) have suggested that the left fusiform gyrus may also be involved in target/non-target discrimination. Druzgal and D'Esposito ( 2001 , 2003 ) have suggested that, although mainly implicated in the processing of visual and emotional stimuli, fusiform gyrus activation may also co-occur along with DLPFC activation during working memory tasks, especially when there is an increase in working memory load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the task was not exactly the same as that utilized by Lamp et al ( 2016 ), both research groups have suggested that the left fusiform gyrus is involved in categorical representation and verbal rehearsal. On the other hand, Galashan et al ( 2015 ) have suggested that the left fusiform gyrus may also be involved in target/non-target discrimination. Druzgal and D'Esposito ( 2001 , 2003 ) have suggested that, although mainly implicated in the processing of visual and emotional stimuli, fusiform gyrus activation may also co-occur along with DLPFC activation during working memory tasks, especially when there is an increase in working memory load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the DMST has the advantages on dividing a process into separate stages, providing a helpful method to compare the effects of different factors. The DMST is a paradigm for studying shortterm memory, and it includes encoding, information extraction and matching, which provides a method for studying the process of memory recall (Galashan et al 2015, Gire 2020, Steffener et al 2020. Li et al used DMST to study the influence of negative emotions on spatial working memory and verbal working memory (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional MRI (fMRI) study provided high spatial-resolution evidence. Galashan et al ( 2015 ) combined EEG and fMRI with the same task, and they found a temporal pattern of source activities starting in occipital and temporal brain regions, followed by a simultaneous engagement of parietal and frontal brain regions and a later activity of a source in pre-supplementary motor area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%