Differences between non-suicidal self injury and suicide attempt in Chinese adolescents

Liang, Siming; Yan, Jing; Zhang, Tao; Zhu, Cuizhen; Situ, Minging; Du, Na; Fu, Xueyin; Huang, Yi

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2013.11.015

Cited by 60 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…No difference between groups on SST6 (good) Glenn and Klonsky [43] USA a Uni/college longitudinal n = 81 F (51.9%) baseline n = 51 F (72.5%) follow-up (mean age = 19)UPPS (short)ISAS lifetime incidence, frequency and current (past 6 month) vs historical Lifetime NSSI frequency was positively associated with LPS at baseline—but not the other UPPS dimensions. LPS was not a significant predictor of NSSI frequency between baseline and follow-up6 (good) Liang et al [57] ChinaSchool concurrent n = 31 F ( 49.1%)NSSI (446), NSSI + SA (48), SA (20) (mean age = 13.92)BIS-11 (Chinese)Self-harm questionnaire lifetime (NSSI), suicide attempt (SA) and (NSSI + SA) Lifetime self-harm groups (NSSI) and (NSSI + SA) associated with increased impulsivity compared to NOSH p < .0083. (NSSI + SA) had higher Impulsivity scores than (NSSI) only5 (moderate) Liu and Mustanski [55] USAOnline longitudinal n = 246.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Assessment of NSSI behaviour was broadly comparable across these 18 studies (see Table 1 for instrument details). 15 out of the 16 studies (excepting Liang et al [57]) that specified the absence of suicidal intent used commonly employed instruments in which the psychometric properties have been validated in adolescent samples and which detailed a range of behaviours against which respondents could identify their own self-injurious behaviour. Listed behaviours across these 16 studies consistently endorsed cutting, burning, and hitting behaviours.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies established self-injury on the basis of single questions that did not specify the absence of intent [55, 64]. When analysing the relationship between impulsivity and NSSI, nine studies classified self-injury as the presence or absence of one or more lifetime NSSI behaviours [13, 44, 48, 56, 57, 59, 60, 62, 64]; four cases compared lifetime to a more recent indication of self-injury [41–43, 45]. Four studies required at least one [47, 63] or two [61] incidents of self-injury in the past year , or one or more incident of cutting in the past 6 months [55].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Impulsivity and self-harm in adolescence: a systematic review

Lockwood

Daley

Townsend

et al. 2016

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry

146

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research supports an association between impulsivity and self-harm, yet inconsistencies in methodology across studies have complicated understanding of this relationship. This systematic review examines the association between impulsivity and self-harm in community-based adolescents aged 11–25 years and aims to integrate findings according to differing concepts and methods. Electronic searches of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, PubMed and The Cochrane Library, and manual searches of reference lists of relevant reviews identified 4496 articles published up to July 2015, of which 28 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-four of the studies reported an association between broadly specified impulsivity and self-harm. However, findings varied according to the conception and measurement of impulsivity and the precision with which self-harm behaviours were specified. Specifically, lifetime non-suicidal self-injury was most consistently associated with mood-based impulsivity-related traits. However, cognitive facets of impulsivity (relating to difficulties maintaining focus or acting without forethought) differentiated current self-harm from past self-harm. These facets also distinguished those with thoughts of self-harm (ideation) from those who acted on thoughts (enaction). The findings suggested that mood-based impulsivity is related to the initiation of self-harm, while cognitive facets of impulsivity are associated with the maintenance of self-harm. In addition, behavioural impulsivity is most relevant to self-harm under conditions of negative affect. Collectively, the findings indicate that distinct impulsivity facets confer unique risks across the life-course of self-harm. From a clinical perspective, the review suggests that interventions focusing on reducing rash reactivity to emotions or improving self-regulation and decision making may offer most benefit in supporting those who self-harm.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impulsivity and self-harm in adolescence: a systematic review

Lockwood

Daley

Townsend

et al. 2016

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry

146

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Of these studies, 11 studies [16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][26][27][28] were from PubMed and Embase, while the other 32 studies [21,22,58] published in Chinese were from Wanfang Data, Chongqing VIP and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Among these studies, we removed 63 duplicate studies.…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…China has the largest population in the world, as well as containing the largest adolescent population. In China, the prevalence of suicide attempts ranged from 0.94% to 9.01% which resulted from published literatures [16,17]. Though, there were a few studies with more than ten thousand adolescents in China, the results were inconsistent [18][19][20][21][22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of suicide attempts among Chinese adolescents: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Dong

Chen

et al. 2015

Comprehensive Psychiatry

201

134

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nonsuicidal self‐injury across cultures and ethnic and racial minorities: A review

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is dominated by research conducted with Caucasian-majority samples in Western countries such as United States, Canada, Australia and European countries. This article critically reviewed the empirical research on NSSI in non-Western countries and among ethnic/racial minority individuals who live in the West to give voice to and understand the patterns of NSSI among individuals who do not fall within the dominant Caucasian majority. The study found both similarities and differences between Western and non-Western data in terms of characteristics and functions of NSSI. Differences in gender patterns in regards to prevalence of NSSI and methods used as well as presence of a more relational functionality of NSSI rather than emotion regulation functionality were two points of divergence in the findings of these studies. In addition, the findings seem to indicate that the role of ethnicity/race is mediated by important factors such as socioeconomic status (SES) and gender. Existing gaps in the literature and suggestions for further research are discussed.

show abstract

Differences between non-suicidal self injury and suicide attempt in Chinese adolescents

Cited by 60 publications

References 39 publications

Impulsivity and self-harm in adolescence: a systematic review

Impulsivity and self-harm in adolescence: a systematic review

Prevalence of suicide attempts among Chinese adolescents: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Nonsuicidal self‐injury across cultures and ethnic and racial minorities: A review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About