1997
DOI: 10.1093/brain/120.6.955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 2 and chronic idiopathic axonal neuropathy. A clinical and electrophysiological study

Abstract: To evaluate whether chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) should be considered as hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 2 (HMSN type 2), we compared the clinical features of 48 patients with CIAP with those of 47 patients with HMSN type 2. In addition, we studied electrophysiological data in 20 patients with CIAP and in 20 patients with HMSN type 2. We found, in patients with HMSN type 2, that the initial symptoms were predominantly motor and that weakness and handicap were more severe and ske… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After comprehensive review of these articles, 12 articles attained a grade of class I, II, or III. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] These articles serve as the major evidence basis for the case definition and are tabulated in table 3.…”
Section: Process Formation Of Expert Panelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After comprehensive review of these articles, 12 articles attained a grade of class I, II, or III. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] These articles serve as the major evidence basis for the case definition and are tabulated in table 3.…”
Section: Process Formation Of Expert Panelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies attained a grade of class I, 6,7 five attained a grade of class II, 3,8,9,11,13 and five attained a grade of class III. 4,5,10,12,14 Diagnostic accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of the predictors was determined by calculating their sensitivities and specificities.…”
Section: Process Formation Of Expert Panelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations