2021
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1974295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between current clinical guidelines for screening, diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and real-world practice: a targeted literature review

Abstract: Introduction: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease and is associated with obesity and metabolic comorbidities. Liver steatosis can progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) exhibiting a relevant risk of fibrosis and ultimately liver failure. To date, no approved treatment for NASH to reduce its clinical and humanistic burden has been developed. Areas covered: We undertook a literature review to identify English language, national and international clinical guidelines … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, scientists designed noninvasive approaches like computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to detect NAFLD. However, these approaches are both costly and time-consuming, and are not suitable for the screening and application of large-scale population [ 47 ]. Thus, simple and convenient new synthetic biological indexes, namely LAP and CMI, are of great significance to the general screening of NAFLD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, scientists designed noninvasive approaches like computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to detect NAFLD. However, these approaches are both costly and time-consuming, and are not suitable for the screening and application of large-scale population [ 47 ]. Thus, simple and convenient new synthetic biological indexes, namely LAP and CMI, are of great significance to the general screening of NAFLD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m) 2 . Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , while overweight was defined as BMI > 25 to <30 kg/m 2 .…”
Section: Presence Of Comorbiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, it is not recommended to screen for liver disease in an asymptomatic, non‐at‐risk population. ( 2 ) Therefore, by extrapolating the available data from tertiary care referral cohorts, the true prevalence of liver disease at a population level is overestimated. In the population‐based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III, elevated serum aminotransferase activity was reported in 7.9% of the included population sample enrolled between 1988 until 1994 in the United States.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of current international guidelines has recently been published [133]. In contrast to the AASLD, European and Asian guidelines recommend that screening be considered for groups considered at risk for developing NAFLD, including patients with obesity and T2D [3,90,91].…”
Section: Screening and Clinical Management Of Nafld In Lean Individua...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There should be a high index of suspicion for NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes Systematic screening of family members for NAFLD is not recommended NAFLD patients [133]. Knowledge of disease etiology, screening, detection methods, and consensus guidelines are becoming increasingly important for adequate clinical care of both lean and obese NAFLD patients, especially for primary care physicians, who are the providers in the best position to make an initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Screening and Clinical Management Of Nafld In Lean Individua...mentioning
confidence: 99%