2015
DOI: 10.1177/0961203315573852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between clinical and laboratory findings in patients with recent diagnosis of SLE according to the positivity of anti-dsDNA by the Crithidia luciliae method

Abstract: The presence of anti-dsDNA by the CLIF method in newly diagnosed SLE was associated with certain markers of increased disease activity. Its use could be a useful biomarker for a specific clinical phenotype suggestive of a more severe involvement at the time of the diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anti-dsDNA level inversely correlated with TLC. Patients positive for anti-dsDNA had significantly higher lymphopenia 17 and anti-dsDNA antibodies correlated with leucopenia. 18…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The anti-dsDNA level inversely correlated with TLC. Patients positive for anti-dsDNA had significantly higher lymphopenia 17 and anti-dsDNA antibodies correlated with leucopenia. 18…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The anti-dsDNA level was significantly increased in those with musculoskeletal manifestations. Patients positive for anti-dsDNA presented significantly more musculoskeletal symptoms at baseline 17 and the anti-dsDNA antibodies correlated with arthritis. 18 In agreement, the presence of antibodies against dsDNA may define a subset of SLE patients suffering from arthritis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 64 eligible studies comprised 66 cohorts with a total of 13,080 SLE patients, of whom 12,542 (95.9%) were reported to be IIF‐ANA positive at various titers (range 76% to 100% calculated sensitivity, see Table ). A total of 7,539 subjects were included as a control population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathogenesis of WM hyperintensity is attributed to chronic small vessel disease, which is supported by a study with radiologic-pathologic correlation in patients with neurolupus (Sibbitt et al, 2010 ). The underlying mechanisms for small vessel disease in neurolupus are not well understood, although multiple factors are incriminated, including accelerated atherosclerosis, direct immune mediated alterations, microembolisms, intimal hyperplasia, erythrocytes extravasation, fibrin thrombi, and coagulopathy (Joseph and Scolding, 2009 ; Sarbu et al, 2015a , c ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%