Differences Between Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients With Anaplastic and Primary Squamous Cell Thyroid Carcinoma and Factors Influencing Prognosis: A SEER Database Analysis

Abstract

PurposeAnaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) and primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid (PSCCTh) have similar histological findings and are currently treated using the same approaches; however, the characteristics and prognosis of these cancers are poorly researched. The objective of this study was to determine the differences in characteristics between ATC and PSCCTh and establish prognostic models.Patients and MethodsAll variables of patients with ATC and PSCCTh, diagnosed from 2004–2015, were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Percentage differences for categorical data were compared using the Chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox-regression for survival analysis, and C-index value was used to evaluate the performance of the prognostic models.ResultsAfter application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 1164 ATC and 124 PSCCTh patients, diagnosed from 2004 to 2015, were included in the study. There were no differences in sex, ethnicity, age, marital status, or percentage of proximal metastases between the two cancers; however, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, incidence of surgical treatment, and presence of multiple primary tumors were higher in patients with ATC than those with PSCCTh. Further cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with PSCCTh was better than that of patients with ATC. Prognostic factors were not identical for the two cancers. Multivariate Cox model analysis indicated that age, sex, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, multiple primary tumors, marital status, and distant metastasis status are independent prognostic factors for CSS in patients with ATC, while for patients with PSCCTh, the corresponding factors are age, radiotherapy, multiple primary tumors, and surgery. The C-index values of the two models were both > 0.8, indicating that the models exhibited good discriminative ability.ConclusionPrognostic factors influencing CSS were not identical in patients with ATC and PSCCTh. These findings indicate that different clinical treatment and management plans are required for patients with these two types of thyroid cancer.

Progress in diagnosing and treating thyroid squamous cell carcinoma under the 5th edition of WHO classification

“…Surgical treatment remains the primary treatment modality for this disease ( 63 ). In surgical treatment, a tiny percentage of patients have relatively small tumors at the time of discovery, and there is a chance of complete surgical resection of the tumor.…”

Update on current diagnosis and management of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma

“…The asymptomatic patients were younger (≤ 60 years) and had smaller tumors (≤ 5 cm) than symptomatic patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma[ 108 ]. Another study found by multivariate analysis that age, sex, marital status, multiple primary tumors, distant metastases, and therapy type were independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival[ 109 ]. A recent large study from China including 1140 patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma management found an overall survival of 27.6% at 6 mo, 15.1% at 1 year, and 6.2% at 2 years.…”

Significant Prognostic Factor at Age Cut-off of 73 Years for Advanced Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma Patients: Insights from Real-World Study

“…4 The factor age is a crucial prognostic factor in numerous types of solid cancer. [5][6][7] Meanwhile, one of the widely recognized risk factors for the prognose of ovarian cancer is age, and the probability of developing ovarian cancer varies according to age. 8,9 It is regrettable that the optimal age threshold is still missing for distinguishing old patients from young patients in AOSC, heretofore.…”