Prolonged cardiac monitoring (PCM) is one of the pillars of the diagnostic workup for patients with ischemic stroke. However, the ideal duration of PCM for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection after stroke has not been established. Recommendations on PCM duration after stroke vary across clinical guidelines from nonspecific long-term monitoring 1 to 2 weeks. 2 Furthermore, AF screening strategies after stroke vary widely in clinical practice, 3,4 possibly due to differences in access to monitoring technologies, 4 vague recommendations from clinical guidelines, 1 and lack of data supporting a specific duration of monitoring.In this issue of Neurology ® , Tsivgoulis et al. 5 report the results of a systematic review and metaanalysis evaluating the association between PCM and stroke recurrence. This study included publications assessing external or insertable cardiac rhythm monitors applied after ischemic stroke or TIA for >7 days vs usual care. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke, defined as ischemic, hemorrhagic, or unclassified. Secondary outcomes included AF detection, use of oral anticoagulants, and occurrence of an intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up. In addition, the authors evaluated disparities between different patient populations and cardiac monitoring technologies, including shorter-duration ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring, external loop recording, and implantable loop recording (ILR). Tsivgoulis et al. 5 included 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 observational studies comprising 1,994 patients with ischemic stroke or TIA. The key finding of the current study was a lack of association between PCM and stroke recurrence in RCTs (relative risk [RR] 0.72, 95% CI 0.49-1.07) despite an apparent strong benefit for PCM in observational studies (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.59). AF detection was significantly higher in RCTs (RR 3.91 vs usual care, 95% CI 2.54-6.03) than in observational studies (RR 2.06 vs routine care, 95% CI 1.57-2.70; p = 0.001 vs RCTs). In addition, PCM was associated with higher use of oral anticoagulants in RCTs and observational studies (aggregate RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.70-2.44) but no difference in intracranial hemorrhage risk (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.20-4.97, randomized studies only). Although the likelihood of AF detection and anticoagulant use was higher for ILR devices, there were no differences in stroke recurrence rates between monitoring technologies.The study by Tsivgoulis et al. 5 has significant strengths, including a sound and comprehensive methodologic approach and meticulous analysis of different outcomes. As a result, this study provides novel insights into the association between PCM and secondary stroke prevention outcomes. The authors thoroughly acknowledged and mitigated the study limitations, related mostly to extrinsic factors such as the observational nature of some studies and heterogeneous comparisons (e.g., different devices, monitoring strategies, and patient populations).There are several explanations for the apparent lack of association betw...