2015
DOI: 10.1177/1053825915569056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences Between Adopted and Nonadopted Adolescents in Wilderness and Residential Treatment

Abstract: Adopted children are disproportionately represented in residential treatment programs in the United States. Adopted children in the United States constitute only 2% to 3% of the U.S population. Nevertheless, they comprise approximately 16.5% of the population in residential care. This descriptive study evaluated a sample of 473 psychological evaluations of adolescents in wilderness and residential treatment centers. Results indicated that, compared with nonadopted youth, adopted youth had greater histories of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This meta-analysis shows that adopters may have a higher chance of suicide attempts than non-adopters. This observation is consistent with other studies that found that people in adoption had two to three times more risk of total suicide than non-adopted people (33). This finding agrees with other systematic reviews or metaanalyses, which found poorer outcomes for adoptees than persons from the general population on indicators of intelligence quotient, cognitive functioning, social adjustment, school achievement, behavioral troubles, psychological problems, and psychiatric diagnoses (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This meta-analysis shows that adopters may have a higher chance of suicide attempts than non-adopters. This observation is consistent with other studies that found that people in adoption had two to three times more risk of total suicide than non-adopted people (33). This finding agrees with other systematic reviews or metaanalyses, which found poorer outcomes for adoptees than persons from the general population on indicators of intelligence quotient, cognitive functioning, social adjustment, school achievement, behavioral troubles, psychological problems, and psychiatric diagnoses (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings also break from suggestions that have been made by some that WT programs are designed, in part, to enhance emotional growth (Bettmann et al, 2015;Russell & Phillips-Myers, 2002). However, given that trait models of EI conceptualize EI as a lower-order personality construct related to dealing with emotion (Petrides et.…”
Section: Outcomes: Emotional Intelligence and Readiness To Changesupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Despite this, no WT studies appear to have explicitly considered the impact of WT on EI. As WT programs have been suggested by some to be designed in part to enhance emotional growth, and because WT clients often have challenges associated with emotional functioning, it is surprising that EI has not been more thoroughly considered in WT research (Bettmann et al, 2015;Russell & Phillips-Myers, 2002).…”
Section: The Conceptual Differences Between Ability Emotional Intelli...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research tells us that adopted children are more likely to exhibit problem behaviors than their nonadopted counterparts (Bettmann, Freeman, & Parry, 2015;Brodzinsky, Radice, Huffman, & Merkler, 1987;Harwood, Feng, & Yu, 2013). Bettmann et al (2015) found in their sample that "adopted adolescents scored significantly higher than their nonadopted peers on the Suicidal Tendency scale" (p. 257). Others have found that adopted children are more likely diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and substance use disorder (Brodzinsky, Smith, & Brodzinsky, 1998).…”
Section: Adopted Children and Mental Illnessmentioning
confidence: 99%