Differences between adolescents in secure residential care and non-residential educational facilities

Abstract

Summary In this cross-sectional study, we examined differences between 351 adolescents allocated to secure residential youth care and the non-residential alternative educational facility School2Care (12–18 years old, 63% boys). Data were collected by means of the official school registration system and standardized questionnaires. Findings Results showed that adolescents in both settings had severe problems. Emergency situations, problems in daily functioning in all life domains, and previous out-of-home placements were found to be associated with allocation to secure residential youth care instead of non-residential alternative education. These three factors may be considered risk factors for secure residential placement of adolescents with complex needs. Applications This study provides input for the prevention of secure residential youth care, because the two dynamic (changeable) risk factors for residential out-of-home placement (i.e., emergency situations and adolescent’s daily life functioning) should be considered as intervention targets in non-residential care, while static factors (i.e., history of out-of-home placement) can be used to improve risk assessment of residential out-of-home placement, with higher risk requiring more intensive treatment according to the risk-need-responsivity model for effective mandated treatment.

Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences in Adolescents with Special Educational and Care Needs in the Netherlands: A Case-File Study of Three Special Educational and Care Settings

“…Adolescents of the studied facility for example face limited intellectual abilities (33%), traumaand stressor-related disorders (15%), disruptive behavior disorders (41%), substance use disorders (16%), and criminal involvement (20%), based on case-file analysis (Pronk et al, 2020). Furthermore, based on structured questionnaires (Pronk et al, 2021), adolescents score in the borderline Jaffee et al, 2013;Merrick & Guinn, 2018;Thornberry et al, 2013;Vervoort-Schel et al, 2021). These items were residential care placement, debts, housing problems, intellectual disabilities of the parent(s), ACEs of parents and a limited social network.…”