1976
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/2.2.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference Taste Thresholds for Sucrose in Water and in Orange Juice: An Interlaboratory Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When using aqueous solutions with a sucrose concentration of 3 and 6 g/100 g, the response of our panel resulted in k = 0.060 and k = 0.057 (no vanilla flavor), and in k = 0.057 and k = 0.062 (with vanilla flavor), respectively. These fractions are close to those presented by Lundgren, Pangborn, Barylko-Pikielna, and Daget (1976) and Berg, Filipello, Hinreiner, and Webb (1955), whereas about twice as high Weber fractions for sucrose sweetness have been published by, e.g., Gilmore and Murphy (1989), McBride (1983) and Laing et al (1983). Weber ratios for sucrose sweetness in water as low as 0.075 have also been quantified for nonhuman primates (Laska, Scheuber, Carrera Sachez, & Rodriguez Luna, 1999).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…When using aqueous solutions with a sucrose concentration of 3 and 6 g/100 g, the response of our panel resulted in k = 0.060 and k = 0.057 (no vanilla flavor), and in k = 0.057 and k = 0.062 (with vanilla flavor), respectively. These fractions are close to those presented by Lundgren, Pangborn, Barylko-Pikielna, and Daget (1976) and Berg, Filipello, Hinreiner, and Webb (1955), whereas about twice as high Weber fractions for sucrose sweetness have been published by, e.g., Gilmore and Murphy (1989), McBride (1983) and Laing et al (1983). Weber ratios for sucrose sweetness in water as low as 0.075 have also been quantified for nonhuman primates (Laska, Scheuber, Carrera Sachez, & Rodriguez Luna, 1999).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Discrimination among sweet stimuli was not different for the two age groups. The mean Wrs for sweet stimuli, .13 (young) and .16 (elderly), were somewhat smaller than the value of .20 reported by Pfaffmann, Bartoshuk, and McBurney (1971), but larger than the values of .10 and .08 reported by Lundgren, Pangborn, Barylko-Pikeilna, and Daget (1976). The Wrs in the present study were consistent with the value of .17 reported by Schutz and Pilgrim (1957), and the value of .13 calculated from McBride (1983).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…[1] present study; [2] Lundgren et al (1976); [3] Gilmore and Murphy (1989); [4] Laing et al (1993); [5] McBride (1983); [6] Geldard (1972); [7] Schutz and Pilgrim (1957); [8] Pfaffmann et al (1971); [9] Fischer et al (1965); [10] Berg et al (1955); [11] Laska et al (1999a, b); [12] Laska (1994); [13] Wagner et al (1965); [14] Brosvic and Slotnick (1986); [15] Scott and Giza (1987)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%