2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-019-1830-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference of a Hauptmodul for Γ0(N) and certain Gross-Zagier type CM value formulas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [21], the author of the present work had shown that the automorphic forms −2 log | j p (z 1 ) − j p (z 2 )| 2 are all Borcherds lifts, and these ultimately motivate us to follow the same idea stated above to extend the Gross-Zagier discriminant formula to the cases for j p (τ). In the proof of Theorem 1.6, we realize the index set of the double sum as a small CM 0-cycle that allows us to apply Schofer's small CM value formula to the associated Borcherds lifts.…”
Section: Remark 13 Recall That Formentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [21], the author of the present work had shown that the automorphic forms −2 log | j p (z 1 ) − j p (z 2 )| 2 are all Borcherds lifts, and these ultimately motivate us to follow the same idea stated above to extend the Gross-Zagier discriminant formula to the cases for j p (τ). In the proof of Theorem 1.6, we realize the index set of the double sum as a small CM 0-cycle that allows us to apply Schofer's small CM value formula to the associated Borcherds lifts.…”
Section: Remark 13 Recall That Formentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It is worthwhile to remark that Yang and Yin's method [16] may give another proof to our Theorem 1.1, and one may find some related work and ideas in [21].…”
Section: Remark I: a Results Of Yang And Yinmentioning
confidence: 97%