2003
DOI: 10.2331/suisan.69.787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in the physical properties of various commercial kamaboko evaluated by puncture test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The puncture test was carried out using the method previously described 1 . The samples were measured at 20°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The puncture test was carried out using the method previously described 1 . The samples were measured at 20°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical parameters for the evaluation are as follows: (I) Force at the 1/3 deformation (dyn); (II) force at the 2/3 deformation (dyn); (III) breaking force (dyn); (IV) breaking deformation (cm); (V) breaking energy (dyn·cm); (VI) jelly strength (dyn·cm); (VII) gel stiffness (dyn/cm); (VIII) gel stiffness of the initial phase (dyn/cm); (IX) gel stiffness of the intermediate phase (dyn/cm); (X) gel stiffness of the final phase (dyn/cm); and (XI) ratio of (VIII) to (VII) (no unit). The definitions of these parameters are given in Tsukamasa et al 1 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations