2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01426-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in the mortality of the CABRI diabetic and nondiabetic populations and its relation to coronary artery disease and the revascularization mode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, many of our patients with MS also had DM and most of the diabetic patients were classified as having MS among the population in which the type 2 DM resulted from obesity. Furthermore, the risk for increased mortality and morbidity of cardiovascular disease in patients with MS is associated with significant overlaps with DM, which is an established risk factor for a poor prognosis following PCI (13)(14)(15). From this viewpoint, risk assessment is warranted in patients with MS alone, DM alone, or both MS and DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, many of our patients with MS also had DM and most of the diabetic patients were classified as having MS among the population in which the type 2 DM resulted from obesity. Furthermore, the risk for increased mortality and morbidity of cardiovascular disease in patients with MS is associated with significant overlaps with DM, which is an established risk factor for a poor prognosis following PCI (13)(14)(15). From this viewpoint, risk assessment is warranted in patients with MS alone, DM alone, or both MS and DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers resulting from observational studies (records) were not considered. We identified a total of 26 randomized studies that met the requirements: RITA 1,2 , ERACI 3,4 , EAST [5][6][7] , GABI 8,9 , CABRI 10,11 , TOULOUSE 12 , BARI [13][14][15][16] , MASSI 17,18 , LAUSANNE 19,20 , ERACI II 21,22 , MASS II [23][24][25] , AWESOME 26,27 , OCTOSTENT 28 , LEIPZIG 29 , SIMA 30,31 , Drenth et al 32 , SOS 33,34 , ARTS 35,36 , LEMANS 37 , SYNTAX 38 , MYOPROTECT 39 , Hong et al 40 , Kim et al 41 , Cisowski et al 42 , AMIST 43 and CÁRDia 44 .…”
Section: Methods Selection and Characteristics Of The Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В 2007 г. Европейское общество кардиологов и Ев-ропейское общество по изучению сахарного диабета рекомендовали чрескожное вмешательство на коронарных артериях (ЧКВ) в качестве метода выбора реваскуляризации миокарда у больных ИБС на фоне СД. В основу Рекомендаций легли результаты трех крупных рандо-мизированных исследований: Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-1), Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation (CABRI) и Emory Angioplasty versus surgery trial (EAST) [2][3][4], выполненных в годы применения баллонной ангиопластики коронарных артерий. Преимущества аорто-коронарного шунтиро-вания (АКШ) в сравнении с ЧКВ в приведенных исследованиях до-казаны не были.…”
Section: сахарный диабетunclassified