Difference in Some Biological Properties of Saline and Non-saline Soil under Sugarcane Cultivation

Lamizadeh, E.; Enayatizamir, Naeimeh; Motamedi, Hossein

doi:10.1134/s1064229319060085

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This can also be seen in Figure 1K, where high values of the indicator NI were observed in T1, presumably with a strong tendency for a denitrification process to occur [54]. At the same time, it has been reported that high C-CO 2 concentration (Figure 1N) and alkaline pH conditions (Figure 1C) could produce inhibitory effects on the OM mineralization process under saline conditions [13,69]. Given the above, it could be established that the addition of BM in the treatments could favor N conversion processes via denitrification and presumably N volatilization processes (Figure 1M).…”

Section: Physicochemical Indicatorssupporting

confidence: 59%

“…The addition of BM as a compost co-substrate presumably improved aeration conditions, allowing for the proliferation of nitrifying microorganisms. This was related to the UA indicator (see below), which showed a maximum value on day 15 of the mineralization dynamics (Figure 2B) presumably stimulated by the addition of N in the treatments when adding BM [69]. An increase in the concentration of N-NO 3 − is considered as the beginning of maturation in the various composting systems [63].…”

Section: Physicochemical Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Agronomy 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 16 of 34 stimulated by the addition of N in the treatments when adding BM [69]. An increase in the concentration of N-NO3 -is considered as the beginning of maturation in the various composting systems [63].…”

Section: Physicochemical Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Compost Quality Indexes (CQIs) of Biosolids Using Physicochemical, Biological and Ecophysiological Indicators: C and N Mineralization Dynamics

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing production of biosolids (BS) as a result of urban wastewater treatment generates pollution problems in their management and final disposal, and a better management is needed for their disposal. The composting of BS is an alternative process for obtaining a product with potential application as an organic amendment in the recovery of agricultural soils. As a biotechnological contribution, this study analyzed a composting process with BS, bovine manure (BM) and rice husks using four treatments T1 (C/N = 24); T2 (C/N = 34); T3 (C/N = 44); T4 (C/N = 54) for 120 days, in order to develop compost quality indexes (CQIs) through the analysis of 18 physicochemical, biological and ecophysiological indicators. Subsequently, three methodologies—successfully used on soils—were implemented for the development of the CQIs called “unified”, “additive” and “nemoro”. The indicators that comprised the CQIs were nitrification index (NI) and synthetic enzymatic index (SEI). The CQIs made it possible to differentiate the quality of the compost according to the treatments applied. The treatments used resulted in composts considered phytonutritious whose average quality value depending on the CQI developed was considered high (CQIw = 0.62), moderate (CQIa = 0.56) and low (CQIn = 0.30). The developed CQIs can be applied to determine the quality of BS composting systems reducing the cost of monitoring.

show abstract

Section: Physicochemical Indicatorssupporting

confidence: 59%

Section: Physicochemical Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 86%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Compost Quality Indexes (CQIs) of Biosolids Using Physicochemical, Biological and Ecophysiological Indicators: C and N Mineralization Dynamics

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The majority of papers referencing the use of SSCP to profile plant‐associated microbial communities focus on rhizosphere populations of bacteria. For example, using SSCP of bacterial 16S rDNA, soil salinity has been shown to increase the diversity of bacteria in sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) rhizospheres (Lamizadeh et al., ), whereas maize ( Zea mays L.) rhizobacterial populations have been shown to significantly vary by soil salinity levels, organic carbon, calcium, and geography (Castellanos et al., ). SSCP was used to profile bacterial populations in healthy and necrotic wood tissues of mature Tunisian grapevines ( Vitis vinifera L.), aiding in the discovery and isolation of 19 unique endophytes with biocontrol potential (Rezgui et al., ).…”

Section: Comparing Dna‐based Methods For Studying Plant Microbiomes (mentioning

confidence: 99%

Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi

Johnston‐Monje

Mejía

2020

Appl Plant Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High‐throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the study of plant‐associated microbial populations, but they are relatively expensive. Molecular fingerprinting techniques are more affordable, yet yield considerably less information about the microbial community. Does this mean they are no longer useful for plant microbiome research? In this paper, we review the past 10 years of studies on plant‐associated microbiomes using molecular fingerprinting methodologies, including single‐strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), amplicon length heterogeneity PCR (LH‐PCR), ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA), and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP). We also present data juxtaposing results from TRFLP methods with those generated using Illumina sequencing in the comparison of rhizobacterial populations of Brazilian maize and fungal surveys in Canadian tomato roots. In both cases, the TRFLP approach yielded the desired results at a level of resolution comparable to that of the MiSeq method, but at a fraction of the cost. Community fingerprinting methods (especially TRFLP) remain relevant for the identification of dominant microbes in a population, the observation of shifts in plant microbiome community diversity, and for screening samples before their use in more sensitive and expensive approaches.

show abstract

“…Molecular epidemiological studies on the exposure of farm children to bacteria in environmental dust [ 56 ], analysis of the fungal flora in environmental dust samples [ 57 ], development of methods to analyze bacterial species diversity in freshwater and soil ecosystems [ 58 ], impact of Fe oxides mineralogy on iron solubilization and associated microbial communities [ 59 ], difference in some biological properties of soils [ 60 ], gene comparison from culturable denitrifying bacteria [ 61 ], food waste composting and microbial community structure profiling [ 62 ].…”

Section: Other Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity and applications of the PCR Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism method

Kakavas

2021

Mol Biol Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Difference in Some Biological Properties of Saline and Non-saline Soil under Sugarcane Cultivation

Cited by 6 publications

References 45 publications

Compost Quality Indexes (CQIs) of Biosolids Using Physicochemical, Biological and Ecophysiological Indicators: C and N Mineralization Dynamics

Compost Quality Indexes (CQIs) of Biosolids Using Physicochemical, Biological and Ecophysiological Indicators: C and N Mineralization Dynamics

Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi

Sensitivity and applications of the PCR Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About