2014
DOI: 10.2989/20702620.2014.917354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in shade tolerance affects foliage–sapwood response to thinning by two eucalypts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the two clones that may have inherited both E. globulus and E. grandis alleles, the E. globulus inheritance seems to have dominated regarding this parameter in the case of HE, while in the case of HG, the E. grandis inheritance seems to have dominated. The SLA values obtained in this study are within the range reported by other authors for eucalypts e.g., 16 [72]. During the seasonal development of the studied clones, SLA decreased progressively over time from autumn-winter leaves to spring-summer leaves.…”
Section: Cuticular Transpiration and Slasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Of the two clones that may have inherited both E. globulus and E. grandis alleles, the E. globulus inheritance seems to have dominated regarding this parameter in the case of HE, while in the case of HG, the E. grandis inheritance seems to have dominated. The SLA values obtained in this study are within the range reported by other authors for eucalypts e.g., 16 [72]. During the seasonal development of the studied clones, SLA decreased progressively over time from autumn-winter leaves to spring-summer leaves.…”
Section: Cuticular Transpiration and Slasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As mentioned above, the leaf area index is directly related to the spacing between individuals. This depends on the shading tolerance shown by the different eucalyptus species [36]. However, contrary results were obtained by Wilkins [37] with very similar values of sapwood proportion in treatments without and with thinning at the age of 2.75 years (1089 and 479 trees•ha −1 , respectively) in E. grandis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%