2002
DOI: 10.1021/ef020141h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in Extraction Yields between CS2/NMP and NMP for Upper Freeport Coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these extractions are often conducted for much shorter periods of time and involve ultrasonic irradiation. Takanohashi et al found that soaking APCS 1 coal in NMP for 2 weeks increased the extraction yield in NMP to ∼28%, which is a result that is comparable to ours.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these extractions are often conducted for much shorter periods of time and involve ultrasonic irradiation. Takanohashi et al found that soaking APCS 1 coal in NMP for 2 weeks increased the extraction yield in NMP to ∼28%, which is a result that is comparable to ours.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Gels can be classified into two broad types: chemical gels, where the crosslinks are chemical bonds; and physical gels, where the junction zones can form as a result of entanglements (in high-molecular-weight polymers), some specific association, or a phase transformation . The latter possibilities are summarized in Figure , following Keller .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of coal is mainly controlled by two factors: one is the solubility of the solvent to coal, and another is the penetration ability of the solvent into the coal cross-link structure . A number of studies have been carried out to examine the existence of synergic effects between two solvents. ,,, The viscosities of high-boiling-point solvents, such as NMP, are too high to enter the cross-link structure of coals. Shui et al reviewed the speculations about the reasons for extraction enhancement in the CS 2 /NMP mixed solvent, and they pointed out that CS 2 may disrupt the dipole-based association of NMP and, thus, decrease the viscosity of the CS 2 /NMP mixed solvent, resulting in NMP penetrating more quickly into the macromolecular network structure of coal and breaking the stronger coal–coal interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction and thermal dissolution (TD) have attracted more and more attention as effective approaches for identifying the structural characteristics of coals and to using coals in a clean and ecofriendly manner. Takanohashi et al , pointed out that some strongly polar solvents and binary solvents, such as pyridine, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and carbon disulfide/ N -methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (CS 2 /NMP), are excellent solvents to dissolve the organic species of bituminous coals. Additionally, a small amount of additives, such as tetracyanoethylene and halogenide salt, are beneficial for increasing the extract yield of bituminous coals in CS 2 /NMP. , Ashida et al , fractionated two bituminous coals and a lignite into six fractions by tetralin and 1-methylnaphthalene (1-MN) using a sequential TD method and examined the difference in the chemical structure and thermal properties of the fractions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies found that the coal extraction yield acquired by mixed-solvent extraction was often higher than that acquired by as ingle-solvent extraction. [8][9][10][11] Mixed solvents composed of carbon disulfide (CS 2 )a nd polar aprotic solvents [such as N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone( NMP), N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF), etc.] have significant advantages for coal extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%