2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2377483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference-in-Differences When Treatment Status Is Observed in Only One Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the results in the present manuscript apply to generalizations of this seup: (1) D may not be available in either period 1, but identification can be obtained by obtaining (D, Z) in a third stratum (see note 12 in Botosaru and Gutierrez, 2018); (2) The moment functions in (C.1)…”
Section: More Examplesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the results in the present manuscript apply to generalizations of this seup: (1) D may not be available in either period 1, but identification can be obtained by obtaining (D, Z) in a third stratum (see note 12 in Botosaru and Gutierrez, 2018); (2) The moment functions in (C.1)…”
Section: More Examplesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Example 5 (Botosaru and Gutierrez, 2018). Consider a difference-in-differences setting with two time periods.…”
Section: More Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section presents the identification strategy and data description. We use the differences-in-difference estimator described by Botosaru and Gutierrez (2017); the reader is referred to their paper for further details on the estimator.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This probability is used to instrument ATT parameters and estimate the effects after policy implementation. Botosaru and Gutierrez (2017) propose consistent and efficient estimators for the case of partially observed treatment status. We rely on their twostage estimator to recover the ATT of LTV limits imposed in Brazil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%