2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03111.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference between the spore sizes of Bacillus anthracis and other Bacillus species

Abstract: Aims:  To determine the size distribution of the spores of Bacillus anthracis, and compare its size with other Bacillus species grown and sporulated under similar conditions. Methods and Results:  Spores from several Bacillus species, including seven strains of B. anthracis and six close neighbours, were prepared and studied using identical media, protocols and instruments. Here, we report the spore length and diameter distributions, as determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We calculated the as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
186
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
186
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are relatively smaller and morphologically different from B. anthracis Sterne, B. thuringiensis or B. cereus (Greenberg et al ., 2010). This was previously found to result in lower adhesiveness of B. atrophaeus spores (Carrera et al ., 2007). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are relatively smaller and morphologically different from B. anthracis Sterne, B. thuringiensis or B. cereus (Greenberg et al ., 2010). This was previously found to result in lower adhesiveness of B. atrophaeus spores (Carrera et al ., 2007). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, non‐pathogenic surrogates for B. anthracis spores that mimic the behaviour of the species of interest are useful for experimental purposes. Based on previous theoretical studies, the following spores of B. anthracis surrogates were used for this work – B. anthracis Sterne (attenuated non‐pathogenic strain of B. anthracis ) , B. cereus (common foodborne pathogen sharing morphological similarities with B. anthracis ) , B. thuringiensis (commonly used to produce a toxin used as an insecticide that is morphologically and genetically similar to B. anthracis ) and B. atrophaeus (most commonly used surrogate) (Carrera et al ., 2007; Greenberg et al ., 2010; Tufts et al ., 2013). While the recovery of spores from surfaces has been studied (Hodges et al ., 2010; Rose et al ., 2011; Calfee et al ., 2013), to date, no published studies have experimentally compared different surrogates of pathogenic B. anthracis spores under indoor conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carrera et al used Percoll gradients to determine the mass density of comparably large amounts of endospores from B. thuringiensis 4055 and B. subtilis 1031 [38]. From the determined density they calculated the mass of a single endospore by using an ellipsoid size model with size estimations from electron microscopy studies [37].…”
Section: ± 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the iterative phase reconstructions using the mHIO algorithm could These values can be compared with measurements of the wet weight, wet and dry density of endospores [38,304]. Carrera et al used Percoll gradients to determine the mass density of comparably large amounts of endospores from B. thuringiensis 4055 and B. subtilis 1031 [38].…”
Section: ± 20mentioning
confidence: 99%