2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.93.024030
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra

Abstract: Gauge-invariant observables for quantum gravity are described, with explicit constructions given primarily to leading order in Newton's constant, analogous to and extending constructions first given by Dirac in quantum electrodynamics. These can be thought of as operators that create a particle, together with its inseparable gravitational field, and reduce to usual field operators of quantum field theory in the weak-gravity limit; they include both Wilson-line operators, and those creating a Coulombic field co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
315
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(318 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
315
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are suppressed in the approximation provided by local quantum field theory on a curved geometry. Their possibility, however, cannot be ruled out in a non-perturbative quantum theory of gravity, and is increasingly considered plausible by a number of authors, on the basis of diverse considerations [26][27][28][29]. These converge in suggesting that local quantum field theory might fail to account for quantum gravity phenomena.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are suppressed in the approximation provided by local quantum field theory on a curved geometry. Their possibility, however, cannot be ruled out in a non-perturbative quantum theory of gravity, and is increasingly considered plausible by a number of authors, on the basis of diverse considerations [26][27][28][29]. These converge in suggesting that local quantum field theory might fail to account for quantum gravity phenomena.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure for constructing the BPT is essentially what we did in the proof of Lemma 4.9 16 It should be noted that the selection of BPOs is not unique and depends on the arbitrary selection of paths between the elements of the MSMP. This freedom, however, only changes the individual BPOs by a constant factor, which does not affect the generalized bipartition structure captured by the BPT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to construct the aforementioned BPT, we will first select a subset of path isometries in the network to be the BPOs. 16 Let Π v q k be all the elements of the MSMP that belong to the connected component q and let Π v q 1 be a single, arbitrarily chosen, element. We first select the path isometries S q k1 by arbitrarily choosing a path from Π v q 1 to each Π v q k for k > 1 and S q 11 := Π v q 1 .…”
Section: Construction Of Bipartition Tables From Minimal Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations