2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-013-1193-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra provides reduced effect of scanner for cortex volumetry with atlas-based method in healthy subjects

Abstract: DARTEL normalization reduces the effect of scanner, which is a major problem in multicenter studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of particular attentions regarding ROI delineations, inter‐individual variabilities may propagate and bias estimations. To reduce these issues, an atlas could be constituted in order to perform a more rigorous voxel‐based analysis . However in our case, anatomical variabilities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of particular attentions regarding ROI delineations, inter‐individual variabilities may propagate and bias estimations. To reduce these issues, an atlas could be constituted in order to perform a more rigorous voxel‐based analysis . However in our case, anatomical variabilities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preprocessing comprised the following steps: 1) removal of the first 10 time points; 2) slice timing correction; 3) three-dimensional motion correction; 4) nonlinear registration of the high-resolution T1 structural images to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template, in which T1 structural images were segmented as white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid using a new segment algorithm with DARTEL (diffeomorphic anatomical registration through exponentiated lie algebra),23 followed by further structural analyses of the resulting segments; 5) spatial normalization to the Montreal Neurological Institute template; 6) resampling of images into a spatial resolution of 3×3×3 mm 3 ; 7) temporal band-pass filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz); 8) linear detrending and nuisance signal removal (white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, global signal, 6-head motion parameters, 6-head motion parameters at one time point earlier, and the 12 corresponding squared items (Friston 24-parameter model) as covariates) via multiple regression. In this study, we excluded subjects from further analysis if the translation or rotation of head movement was >2 mm or 2° in any direction; the group differences in head motion were evaluated among the patients with PHN (n=18) and the HC subjects (n=18) according to the frame-wise displacement (FD) criteria described by Van Dijk et al24…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The realigned pre and postECT images are then corrected for signal inhomogeneities (bias correction) with regard to the reference mean image. In the next step, spatial normaliza tion parameters (using Diffeomorphic Anatomic Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra (DARTEL 21,22 ) are esti mated using segmentations of the mean biascorrected image. These normalization parameters are applied to the segmentations of the biascorrected, realigned pre and post ECT images.…”
Section: Vbm Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%