2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cali.2015.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diferencias entre las recomendaciones y la práctica clínica en la infección por Clostridium difficile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the previous studies, in which adherence of the initial CDI treatment to the treatment guidelines ranged from 40.2 -54.0% [3][4][5][6], in our tertiary care center specialized in infectious diseases the higher, but stil unsatisfactory adherence of 61% has been recorded.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison to the previous studies, in which adherence of the initial CDI treatment to the treatment guidelines ranged from 40.2 -54.0% [3][4][5][6], in our tertiary care center specialized in infectious diseases the higher, but stil unsatisfactory adherence of 61% has been recorded.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Studies analysing the gudelines adherence reported mostly its decrease with increase of disease severity [4,6], and the adherence as low as 8.5% in a group of severe CDI [4], along with adherence of 16.6% in a group of fulminant CDI has been reported [5]. In a study from USA that analyzed patient factors which indicate provider's nonadherence to an institutional CDI treatment guidelines, bivariate analyses associated 5 factors with nonadherence: older age, ICU admission, duration of antibiotics and mild/moderate and severe infection (all p<.05), and in the logistic regression model, severe infection (p<.001) was independently associated with guideline nonadherence [6], which suggests disregarding of disease-severity criteria while choosing initial CDI therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The consequence of this situation is the coexistence of guidelines with certain differences in their recommendations that may raise doubts in the minds of treating physicians at the time of clinical decision making [ 14 ]. This insecurity, in turn, may also contribute to the low adherence to existing guidelines observed in various studies [ 15 17 ]. Indeed, an elevated proportion of clinicians agree on the main points where current CDI management practices could and should be improved [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%